Recognize addresses defined by relations

[ltog]

General description

Up until now, only addresses defined by the "Karlsruhe Schema" are recognized. We should evaluate also the relations "street" and "associatedStreet".

See:

• http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:street
• http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet

TagInfo statistics

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=street#relations

Evaluation

Relation:
type = (street|associatedStreet)
name =

Members:
role: street (Way segments belonging to the street)
role: (house|address|addr:houselink)

What kind of tagging errors can occur?

• Relations can carry a street name which doesn't exist
• Relations with type=(street|associatedStreet) contain one of the following keys: street, address, house, associated (these are roles for the relation's members, not tags for the relation itself!)
• Relation type=associatedStreet contains other keys than: type, name (A relation with type=associatedStreet must only have the keys "type" and "name")
• Relation contains members without roles
• ...

[stephan75]

Hello ltog,
after the successful expandation of the address layer features in February 2016, is there any chance of progress for this issue?

Because in the "no addr:street tag" category (pink dots) we still have objects with addr:housenumber=* but no addr:street or addr:place BUT they belong to an associatedStreet relation.

PS: I really appreciate and enjoy your efforts so far, and I don't want to act like an ungrateful person by pushing you to the next wish. So yout own personal timing is more important!!