Add keep rule for keeping generic signature of return types - #3886
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
I suspect this means we can delete https://github.com/square/retrofit/blob/master/retrofit-adapters/rxjava3/src/main/resources/META-INF/proguard/retrofit2-rxjava3-adapter.pro and the others whose goal was to mitigate this. I'll do that and merge tomorrow. |
Collaborator
|
Based on the linked bug, the rules which were already embedded in the adapters should have kept the signature. Regardless, your rule is superior since it covers all potential return values instead of us having to remember to include it for every type. |
1 task
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The additional rule generalises keeping the generic signature of return type of service methods. The rule effectively fixes an issue with RxJava3 Observables as reported in b/280277628.