New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Async support #293
Comments
@SlyNet I would find it helpful if you could give an example of how you would envisage this working and perhaps say something about why it would be useful. From your description, it isn't self-evident to me what you are actually requesting. |
|
Any news on this feature? |
We've successfully used the above pattern in our code and it works, although it probably shouldn't be relied on. This is slated for 2.0, and for now the usable workaround is just to call |
Is there a 2.0.0 preview we can try? |
We really would love async in our machine spec tests. |
I was hoping to bundle this with |
SlyNet commentedApr 15, 2016
•
edited by ivanz
Establish, Because and It should support async
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: