Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] Use Variable for border-radius #28674

Closed
m2-assistant bot opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #28548
Closed

[Issue] Use Variable for border-radius #28674

m2-assistant bot opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #28548
Assignees
Labels
Area: Lib/Frontend Component: Css Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.

Comments

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 10, 2020

Preconditions:
This issue is automatically created based on existing pull request: #28548: Use Variable for border-radius

The border-radius was hardcoded, so i changed it to: @button__border-radius

Steps to reproduce:

Variable @button__border-radius is defined in lib/web/css/source/lib/variables/_buttons.less library and has default value for border-radius = 3px
screenshot_51

Actual Result

Expected Result

We don't need to hardcoded value if we use the default value for the border-radius

@ghost ghost added this to Ready for QA in Community Backlog Jun 10, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed and removed Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed labels Jun 10, 2020
@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added Area: Design/Frontend Area: Lib/Frontend Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”. and removed Area: Design/Frontend labels Jun 11, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from Ready for QA to PR In Progress in Community Backlog Jun 11, 2020
@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa self-assigned this Jun 11, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 11, 2020

Hi @engcom-Alfa. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added the Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch label Jun 11, 2020
@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa removed their assignment Jun 11, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from PR In Progress to Ready for QA in Community Backlog Jun 11, 2020
@engcom-Delta engcom-Delta self-assigned this Jun 30, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 30, 2020

Hi @engcom-Delta. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@ghost ghost added the Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. label Aug 13, 2020
@engcom-Alfa engcom-Alfa added Component: Css Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Aug 14, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from Ready for QA to Ready for Dev in Community Backlog Aug 14, 2020
@ghost ghost removed the Progress: ready for QA label Aug 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development label Aug 14, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Alfa
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-36751 were created

Issue Available: @engcom-Alfa, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch label Aug 24, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @m2-assistant[bot]. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #28548 by @Scarbous in 2.4-develop branch
Related commit(s):

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.2 release.

@ghost ghost moved this from Ready for Dev to Done (last 30 days) in Community Backlog Aug 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Lib/Frontend Component: Css Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
Projects
No open projects
Community Backlog
  
Done (last 30 days)
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants