Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upUse which-function instead of add-log-current-defun #3483
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
|
I think |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
kidd
Jun 16, 2018
Contributor
oh, you're right... Do you think it makes sense to:
- test for (fboundp which-function) and do one thing or the other?
- require which-func first
- not even worth it
|
oh, you're right... Do you think it makes sense to:
|
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
|
Nah, just require it. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
kidd
Jun 16, 2018
Contributor
Done. Thanks!
Btw, how do you usually check if a function has to be required manually or it's already required by default? is emacs -Q the usual way?
|
Done. Thanks! Btw, how do you usually check if a function has to be required manually or it's already required by default? is |
tarsius
merged commit 2e84b68
into
magit:master
Jun 18, 2018
kidd
deleted the
kidd:use-which-function
branch
Jun 18, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
kidd commentedJun 14, 2018
•
edited
which-functionusesadd-log-current-defunas one of many helpers so itshould only improve the experience.
I've tried it with lua files and it works good enough. elisp work equally well as before so far.