posix: implement memfd and file sealing - #418
Conversation
|
CI is failing right now because it depends on a definition of |
|
Addressed the issues raised above. |
|
Dropped some noops that are better served by |
|
Blocked on mesa not compiling with memfd present, due to it making direct Linux syscalls. |
I think I might be able to patch that out but with weston 10 crashing consistently I'm unable to properly test that. Feel free to ping me on discord at a later date so I can look at it. |
| if(logRequests) | ||
| std::cout << "posix: MEMFD_CREATE " << req->name() << std::endl; | ||
|
|
||
| std::cout << "posix: MEMFD_CREATE ignores some flags" << std::endl; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't we return EINVAL for unsupported flags?
|
Pushed commits that fixed Dennis' issues. Weston 10 now works for both of us. |
avdgrinten
left a comment
avdgrinten
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See below. Also, this PR contains commits that are not related to memfd and file sealing; this should be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Bonke <admin@dennisbonke.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Bonke <admin@dennisbonke.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Bonke <admin@dennisbonke.com>
|
Addressed the issues raised above. |
|
LGTM now |
avdgrinten
left a comment
avdgrinten
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One small comment, can be merged afterwards.
4 participants
The
MemoryFileused here is an adapted version of the same struct in tmpfs, stripped of some functionality not yet needed.