New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alternate versions of files #1848
Comments
|
i've been messing around with manyfold again and poking around the code. I know that my use-case doesn't exactly reflect the use-case of the many That being said, expanding on my original thoughts here - it seems recursive scanning beyond the configured folder structure is what is bothering me. It seems that I have the folder structure set to, for example, {creator}/{modelName} for a library called figurines, I would want to have the model be at /libraries/creator/modelname with nested folders being visible inside the model view as additional files/resources, not added as additional models. And once this "root" model folder has been established, being able to view (by filename, not render) all files in that folder would be swell. Right now it feels like the only viable organization method for models is having flat folders for models, organized by nested tag folders. I guess, if I had to summarize, I am hoping for a self-hosted variant of something like Thingiverse or Printables for my personal model collection. Also - I hope I'm not coming across as nitpicky. I love what this project might represent and if I were even halfway decent at coding i'd love to contribute. Maybe in the future! |
|
This should be possible, but it might not be obvious or particularly frictionless. I've got some documentation to write and I'll try to include scenarios like this in it. |
|
I've been thinking on this and it seems to me a potential solution is having common_subfolders be user definable and able to be recursively scanned. I've been trying at it but haven't got it working But that would allow you to define folders that expected by name, even nested and have it be part of the model. I feel a big advantage here is not having to sort model files by name, allowing you to only need to worry about directory tree Something like would be able to match All to a single model I'll keep poking at it and see if I can make anything work |
Initially requested by @Rukongai in #1701
#35 will do this for supported/unsupported, but is there something else we could make for custom variants perhaps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: