Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to document styleObj GeomTransform expressions. #4332

Closed
sdlime opened this issue May 29, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

Need to document styleObj GeomTransform expressions. #4332

sdlime opened this issue May 29, 2012 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@sdlime
Copy link
Member

sdlime commented May 29, 2012

RFC 64 introduced some new capabilities to transform geometries using GEOS operators- specifically a buffer operator was exposed in 6.0+. This needs to be documented. See:

http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-64.html

for example usage. See also the "polygon-as-line-offset" renderer auto-test.

Steve

@havatv
Copy link

havatv commented Jun 1, 2012

Documentation has been added to the style document for 6.0 in commit MapServer/MapServer-documentation@bf075af, and the same changes for trunk in MapServer/MapServer-documentation@744d7389c8c0da .
@sdlime, can you check the commit and close this issue if everything is OK?

@sdlime
Copy link
Member Author

sdlime commented Jun 5, 2012

I think this will suffice for the moment. As we expose more and more GEOS functionality this way we'll need more detail but that's another ticket. Closing...

Steve

@sdlime sdlime closed this as completed Jun 5, 2012
havatv pushed a commit to MapServer/MapServer-documentation that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2012
 (changes in defaults), also removed a number of deprecated parameters / keywords - more comments in the issue
@havatv
Copy link

havatv commented Aug 27, 2012

OOOPS, that commit was supposed to reference issue #4435. Sorry!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants