Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

valgrind leaks #4794

Closed
tbonfort opened this issue Oct 15, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

valgrind leaks #4794

tbonfort opened this issue Oct 15, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@tbonfort
Copy link
Member

@tbonfort tbonfort commented Oct 15, 2013

some leaks detected by valgrind in the autotests

  • [ ]
==11763== 54 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 131 of 251
==11763==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==11763==    by 0x4ED68B2: msSetOutputFormatOption (mapoutput.c:747)
==11763==    by 0x4ED542A: msCreateDefaultOutputFormat (mapoutput.c:192)
==11763==    by 0x4ED5281: msCreateDefaultOutputFormat (mapoutput.c:164)
==11763==    by 0x4FD8FD3: loadOutputFormat (mapfile.c:4947)
==11763==    by 0x4FDDF3D: loadMapInternal (mapfile.c:6269)
==11763==    by 0x4FDEA7C: msLoadMap (mapfile.c:6522)
==11763==    by 0x401677: main (shp2img.c:126)
==11763==
==11763== 60 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 133 of 251
==11763==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==11763==    by 0x4ED68B2: msSetOutputFormatOption (mapoutput.c:747)
==11763==    by 0x4ED5444: msCreateDefaultOutputFormat (mapoutput.c:193)
==11763==    by 0x4ED5281: msCreateDefaultOutputFormat (mapoutput.c:164)
==11763==    by 0x4FD8FD3: loadOutputFormat (mapfile.c:4947)
==11763==    by 0x4FDDF3D: loadMapInternal (mapfile.c:6269)
==11763==    by 0x4FDEA7C: msLoadMap (mapfile.c:6522)
==11763==    by 0x401677: main (shp2img.c:126)
==11763==
  • [ ]
==10997== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 97 of 251
==10997==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10997==    by 0x60AE89A: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AEBBA: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AEE08: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AEE72: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AD12B: fribidi_get_par_embedding_levels (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x504A4F7: msLayoutTextSymbol (textlayout.c:609)
==10997==    by 0x4F3F2E0: msComputeTextPath (maplabel.c:174)
==10997==    by 0x4F8E59F: msDrawLabelCache (mapdraw.c:2803)
==10997==    by 0x4F834E4: msDrawMap (mapdraw.c:402)
==10997==    by 0x40217B: main (shp2img.c:293)
==10997==
==10997== 4,080 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 248 of 251
==10997==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10997==    by 0x60AE802: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AEBD2: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AEE08: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AEE72: ??? (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x60AD12B: fribidi_get_par_embedding_levels (in /usr/lib/libfribidi.so.0.3.1)
==10997==    by 0x504A4F7: msLayoutTextSymbol (textlayout.c:609)
==10997==    by 0x4F3F2E0: msComputeTextPath (maplabel.c:174)
==10997==    by 0x4F8E59F: msDrawLabelCache (mapdraw.c:2803)
==10997==    by 0x4F834E4: msDrawMap (mapdraw.c:402)
==10997==    by 0x40217B: main (shp2img.c:293)
==10997==
  • [ ]
==11964== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 250
==11964==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==11964==    by 0x540FD81: strdup (strdup.c:43)
==11964==    by 0x4F02F76: msStrdup (mapstring.c:2060)
==11964==    by 0x4ED6212: msSelectOutputFormat (mapoutput.c:576)
==11964==    by 0x4ED519D: msPostMapParseOutputFormatSetup (mapoutput.c:137)
==11964==    by 0x4FDDB52: loadMapInternal (mapfile.c:6203)
==11964==    by 0x4FDEA7C: msLoadMap (mapfile.c:6522)
==11964==    by 0x4EE678F: msCGILoadMap (mapservutil.c:220)
==11964==    by 0x401002: main (mapserv.c:238)
==11964==
  • [ ]
==11824== 56 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 137 of 259
==11824==    at 0x4C2B1C7: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==11824==    by 0xA7DC612: geos::geom::GeometryFactory::createLinearRing(geos::geom::CoordinateSequence*) const (in /usr/lib/libgeos-3.3.8.so)
==11824==    by 0x67FEBB7: GEOSGeom_createLinearRing_r (in /usr/lib/libgeos_c.so.1.7.8)
==11824==    by 0x4EB612C: msGEOSShape2Geometry_simplepolygon (mapgeos.c:262)
==11824==    by 0x4EB63CD: msGEOSShape2Geometry_polygon (mapgeos.c:317)
==11824==    by 0x4EB65A9: msGEOSShape2Geometry (mapgeos.c:365)
==11824==    by 0x4EB8046: msGEOSIntersects (mapgeos.c:1211)
==11824==    by 0x4F5C139: msHitTestLayer (hittest.c:214)
==11824==    by 0x4F5C4BC: msHitTestMap (hittest.c:285)
==11824==    by 0x4ECC8D4: msWMSGetContentDependantLegend (mapwms.c:4619)
==11824==    by 0x4ECE0C3: msWMSDispatch (mapwms.c:5027)
==11824==    by 0x4EDFC86: msOWSDispatch (mapows.c:244)
==11824==
==11824== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 177 of 259
==11824==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==11824==    by 0x4F43D9F: msAddLine (mapprimitive.c:316)
==11824==    by 0x4F44075: msRectToPolygon (mapprimitive.c:382)
==11824==    by 0x4F5BFF3: msHitTestLayer (hittest.c:187)
==11824==    by 0x4F5C4BC: msHitTestMap (hittest.c:285)
==11824==    by 0x4ECC8D4: msWMSGetContentDependantLegend (mapwms.c:4619)
==11824==    by 0x4ECE0C3: msWMSDispatch (mapwms.c:5027)
==11824==    by 0x4EDFC86: msOWSDispatch (mapows.c:244)
==11824==    by 0x4EED6E2: msCGIDispatchRequest (mapservutil.c:1647)
==11824==    by 0x401055: main (mapserv.c:259)
==11824==
==11824== 96 (16 direct, 80 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 227 of 259
==11824==    at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==11824==    by 0x4F43E53: msAddLineDirectly (mapprimitive.c:333)
==11824==    by 0x4F43E2D: msAddLine (mapprimitive.c:321)
==11824==    by 0x4F44075: msRectToPolygon (mapprimitive.c:382)
==11824==    by 0x4F5BFF3: msHitTestLayer (hittest.c:187)
==11824==    by 0x4F5C4BC: msHitTestMap (hittest.c:285)
==11824==    by 0x4ECC8D4: msWMSGetContentDependantLegend (mapwms.c:4619)
==11824==    by 0x4ECE0C3: msWMSDispatch (mapwms.c:5027)
==11824==    by 0x4EDFC86: msOWSDispatch (mapows.c:244)
==11824==    by 0x4EED6E2: msCGIDispatchRequest (mapservutil.c:1647)
==11824==    by 0x401055: main (mapserv.c:259)
  • [ ]
==10763== Invalid read of size 1
==10763==    at 0x4C2DCAB: bcmp (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10763==    by 0x4EB1006: msGetFontFace (fontcache.c:204)
==10763==    by 0x50492EF: check_single_font (textlayout.c:227)
==10763==    by 0x50495B4: get_face_for_run (textlayout.c:294)
==10763==    by 0x504AB60: msLayoutTextSymbol (textlayout.c:681)
==10763==    by 0x4F3F2E0: msComputeTextPath (maplabel.c:174)
==10763==    by 0x4F4B52A: msLineLabelPath (mapprimitive.c:1828)
==10763==    by 0x4F4B3D9: msPolylineLabelPath (mapprimitive.c:1775)
==10763==    by 0x4F884AD: lineLayerDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1616)
==10763==    by 0x4F89DC5: msDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1961)
==10763==    by 0x4F85573: msDrawVectorLayer (mapdraw.c:993)
==10763==    by 0x4F84662: msDrawLayer (mapdraw.c:728)
==10763==  Address 0x16571080 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
==10763==    at 0x4C2A82E: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10763==    by 0x4FCC742: freeLabel (mapfile.c:1779)
==10763==    by 0x4F3F526: freeTextSymbol (maplabel.c:209)
==10763==    by 0x4F88914: lineLayerDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1692)
==10763==    by 0x4F89DC5: msDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1961)
==10763==    by 0x4F85573: msDrawVectorLayer (mapdraw.c:993)
==10763==    by 0x4F84662: msDrawLayer (mapdraw.c:728)
==10763==    by 0x4F8326A: msDrawMap (mapdraw.c:351)
==10763==    by 0x40217B: main (shp2img.c:293)
==10763==
==10763== Invalid read of size 1
==10763==    at 0x4C2DCC0: bcmp (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10763==    by 0x4EB1006: msGetFontFace (fontcache.c:204)
==10763==    by 0x50492EF: check_single_font (textlayout.c:227)
==10763==    by 0x50495B4: get_face_for_run (textlayout.c:294)
==10763==    by 0x504AB60: msLayoutTextSymbol (textlayout.c:681)
==10763==    by 0x4F3F2E0: msComputeTextPath (maplabel.c:174)
==10763==    by 0x4F4B52A: msLineLabelPath (mapprimitive.c:1828)
==10763==    by 0x4F4B3D9: msPolylineLabelPath (mapprimitive.c:1775)
==10763==    by 0x4F884AD: lineLayerDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1616)
==10763==    by 0x4F89DC5: msDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1961)
==10763==    by 0x4F85573: msDrawVectorLayer (mapdraw.c:993)
==10763==    by 0x4F84662: msDrawLayer (mapdraw.c:728)
==10763==  Address 0x16571081 is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
==10763==    at 0x4C2A82E: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10763==    by 0x4FCC742: freeLabel (mapfile.c:1779)
==10763==    by 0x4F3F526: freeTextSymbol (maplabel.c:209)
==10763==    by 0x4F88914: lineLayerDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1692)
==10763==    by 0x4F89DC5: msDrawShape (mapdraw.c:1961)
==10763==    by 0x4F85573: msDrawVectorLayer (mapdraw.c:993)
==10763==    by 0x4F84662: msDrawLayer (mapdraw.c:728)
==10763==    by 0x4F8326A: msDrawMap (mapdraw.c:351)
==10763==    by 0x40217B: main (shp2img.c:293)
@dmorissette
Copy link
Contributor

@dmorissette dmorissette commented May 12, 2015

@tbonfort, we came across one of the errors above (not a leak but an actual error). Did you look into it, or need a testcase to look into it?

==10763== Invalid read of size 1
==10763==    at 0x4C2DCAB: bcmp (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10763==    by 0x4EB1006: msGetFontFace (fontcache.c:204)
==10763==    by 0x50492EF: check_single_font (textlayout.c:227)
...
tbonfort added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2015
@tbonfort
Copy link
Member Author

@tbonfort tbonfort commented Jun 16, 2015

@dmorissette 6b982bb should have taken care of it, can you confirm?

@jratike80
Copy link

@jratike80 jratike80 commented Nov 9, 2015

So, it this OK now?

@tbonfort tbonfort closed this Nov 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.