You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When calling isDefEq on expressions containing level mvars, those level mvars aren't necessarily assigned. This causes problems, e.g. when using Config.Encoding.eraseConstLvls.
Using a syntactic unification like the example below won't work as we still need to be able to unify syntactically different expressions if we want to (a) use natlit-conversions and (b) skip proofs by refl in proof reconstruction.
When calling
isDefEq
on expressions containing level mvars, those level mvars aren't necessarily assigned. This causes problems, e.g. when usingConfig.Encoding.eraseConstLvls
.Using a syntactic unification like the example below won't work as we still need to be able to unify syntactically different expressions if we want to (a) use natlit-conversions and (b) skip proofs by refl in proof reconstruction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: