A working study of the link (?) between campaign finance and political corruption in the U.S. States.
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Failed to load latest commit information.
Hand - Qualifying Paper Submission.pdf



Since the 1970s, the US Supreme Court has frustrated efforts at campaign finance reform by holding that nearly all limits on political spending violate the first amendment?s protection of free speech, with only one exception: to prevent ?corruption of the appearance of corruption.? Using state-level data from 1990-2012 on contribution limits, corruption arrests, and media mentions of corruption, this paper employs a linear panel regression and a difference-in-differences analysis to test whether campaign contribution limits are associated with lower levels of corruption arrests or media mentions of corruption. These methods find no relationship between the presence or level of campaign finance laws and quid pro quo corruption. As current challenges to contribution limits wind their way through federal courts, the answer to this question will inform the Supreme Court?s decision to uphold or strike down remaining limits on political campaign contributions.


contains prior work, analyses, and images


Contains other authors' replication data used in this analysis. Data from Michael Barber and James Alt are masked in the GitHub repository, but available by email with permission from those authors.


Current analysis and draft paper


An early poster I should have put in its own folder; can't change the link now because the Internet won't follow. Still learning.