Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wording should be changed #28

Closed
ghlouwho opened this issue Jan 5, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Wording should be changed #28

ghlouwho opened this issue Jan 5, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@ghlouwho
Copy link

ghlouwho commented Jan 5, 2022

P 171 #4. "Delete the ex" = ????. How about Change "Throw ex;", to "throw". OR, Remove the 'ex' from the 'Throw ex;' statement.

@ghlouwho
Copy link
Author

ghlouwho commented Jan 5, 2022

P 186 - #2,#4 - did you want to say something about the two different ways that you used to initiate a new person?

@markjprice
Copy link
Owner

Before Step 4, I explain the second way of instantiating a new person, "You can also initialize fields using a shorthand object initializer syntax using curly braces. Let's see how."

@markjprice
Copy link
Owner

You're doing good work identifying areas that the book can be refined. Have you considered becoming a formal reviewer? You could ask Packt to be a technical reviewer for my 7th edition. Packt will tell you what is involved. If you have the time and inclination then you can apply using the following form: https://www.packtpub.com/contact

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants