Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using relative links instead of hard coding / #85

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
Contributor

challgren commented Apr 16, 2013

Fixes issues #75 and uses relative paths instead of hard coding / in the path

+1

It is no longer a clean merge since it's been so long. This would make it easier for me to include iodocs along with my api deployments instead of having to deploy another domain and keep them in sync. I'm glad to open a new pull request off current master if it had a chance of getting merged. What blocked this one?

Contributor

challgren commented Sep 11, 2013

I'll update the branch later this week shouldn't be too hard to fix
On Sep 10, 2013 9:05 PM, "James Sullivan" notifications@github.com wrote:

+1

It is no longer a clean merge since it's been so long. This would make it
easier for me to include iodocs along with my api deployments instead of
having to deploy another domain and keep them in sync. I'm glad to open a
new pull request off current master if it had a chance of getting merged.
What blocked this one?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/mashery/iodocs/pull/85#issuecomment-24208477
.

Any update @challgren ?

Contributor

mansilladev commented Apr 28, 2014

If this can be rebased by either @jsullivanlive or @challgren we'll review and accept stat. Thanks!

Contributor

challgren commented Apr 28, 2014

I'll work on it in a few minutes. I'll open a new PR when I'm done.

@challgren challgren closed this Apr 28, 2014

@challgren challgren deleted the unknown repository branch Apr 28, 2014

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment