Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Some small cleanups based on Quantified code #6154
Conversation
mdboom
added the
needs_review
label
Mar 14, 2016
Skimming through seems like the other things it finds have reasonable signal-to-noise. |
|
My main problem with enabling it on PR's is that it seems to detect new issues in a PR in parts of the code that has't been touched so I am worried about false failures |
|
This needs a rebase |
tacaswell
added this to the
2.1 (next point release)
milestone
Mar 21, 2016
jenshnielsen
added some commits
Mar 8, 2016
QuLogic
commented on an outdated diff
Mar 21, 2016
examples/lines_bars_and_markers/barh_demo.py
| import numpy as np | ||
| -import matplotlib.pyplot as plt | ||
| +plt.rcdefaults() |
QuLogic
Member
|
QuLogic
commented on an outdated diff
Mar 21, 2016
QuLogic
and 2 others
commented on an outdated diff
Mar 21, 2016
lib/matplotlib/tests/test_simplification.py
| @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ | ||
| import matplotlib.pyplot as plt | ||
| from pylab import * |
tacaswell
Owner
|
jenshnielsen
added some commits
Mar 21, 2016
tacaswell
merged commit 4e725b8
into matplotlib:master
Mar 26, 2016
tacaswell
removed the
needs_review
label
Mar 26, 2016
jenshnielsen
deleted the
jenshnielsen:quantifiedcodecleanup branch
Mar 26, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
jenshnielsen commentedMar 14, 2016
I was testing out Quantified code on Matplotlib here
I'm not sure we want to enable that in general but I found a few issues worth fixing here: