Patch issue 6035 rebase #6504

Merged
merged 12 commits into from May 30, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
Owner

jenshnielsen commented May 30, 2016 edited by QuLogic

Rebased and changed prepare method to be private to hopefully fix issue with tests.

I squashed 2 commits that changed the same figures to reduce the size of the repository.

Replaces #6054

@tacaswell tacaswell merged commit 24c0863 into matplotlib:master May 30, 2016

1 of 3 checks passed

coverage/coveralls Coverage decreased (-0.001%) to 69.592%
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr Waiting for AppVeyor build to complete
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

tacaswell removed the needs_review label May 30, 2016

Contributor

afvincent commented May 30, 2016

@jenshnielsen thank you for the solution about the remaining issue with test_artist.test_clipping. I wouldn't have find it.

@tacaswell tacaswell added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2016

@tacaswell tacaswell Merge pull request #6504 from jenshnielsen/patch-issue-6035-rebase
FIX: dpi dependent arrow heads
Conflicts:
	lib/matplotlib/tests/baseline_images/test_transforms/pre_transform_data.png

Keep version form cherry-pick

Manually backport part of bd63121 which
renamed the test files.
72653f2
Owner

tacaswell commented May 31, 2016

backported to v2.x as 72653f2

Did not go super cleanly due to a rename of test images.

@tacaswell tacaswell added a commit to tacaswell/matplotlib that referenced this pull request May 31, 2016

@tacaswell tacaswell TST: add small tolerances to streamplot tests
These tests did not backport cleanly from
matplotlib#6504
374b6c0
Owner

jenshnielsen commented May 31, 2016

@afvincent No problem. For the record I found it because I noticed that the tests were not failing if run individually. If you add a --verbose to python tests.py you can also see that the prepare method was being run as a test.

jenshnielsen deleted the jenshnielsen:patch-issue-6035-rebase branch Sep 11, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment