Update examples/README.txt. #8099

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 19, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
Contributor

anntzer commented Feb 19, 2017

All's in the title.

@afvincent

The changes look good to me. Thanks for updating some old links or toolkit names!

Is it normal that not all the sections present in the examples web page are listed in the current README file? If I do not forget any:

  • color
  • frontpage (well maybe this one should not be listed ^^)
  • images_contours_and_fields
  • lines_bars_and_markers
  • pie_and_polar_charts
  • pyplot (BTW, why are there some whats_new_*.py files?)
  • scales
  • shapes_and_collections
  • showcase
  • specialty_plots
  • statistics
  • style_sheets
  • subplots_axes_and_figures
  • text_labels_and_annotations
  • ticks_and_spines

are missing.

Should we add entries for all of them in the current bullet list or simply wait for the expected documentation overhaul likely to happen during the March “docathon?”

examples/README.txt
- * units - working with unit data an custom types in matplotlib
+ * units - Working with unit data an custom types in Matplotlib.
@afvincent

afvincent Feb 19, 2017 edited

Contributor

“… unit data an custom…” <- “… unit data and custom…”? Edit: typo…

@anntzer

anntzer Feb 19, 2017

Contributor

fixed

@anntzer anntzer Update examples/README.txt.
add8155
Contributor

anntzer commented Feb 19, 2017

I'm sure we can add a TODO for the docathon regarding the missing entries :-)

@afvincent

I am fine with the idea of a “to-do” for the docathon about adding the missing entries to this README file (or tweaking it in any relevant way after the changes that are likely to occur to the examples).

Contributor

afvincent commented Feb 19, 2017

Travis' unhappiness seems unrelated (the failure is due to the flaky test_mplot3d.py::test_mixedsubplots).

@NelleV

NelleV approved these changes Feb 19, 2017

@NelleV NelleV merged commit 747792b into matplotlib:master Feb 19, 2017

5 checks passed

codecov/patch Coverage not affected when comparing 3b9a916...add8155
Details
codecov/project/library 62.29% (+0.05%) compared to 3b9a916
Details
codecov/project/tests 97.97% (target 97.7%)
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment