Supported FreeBSD10 as per #225 #982

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
Member

pelson commented Jun 30, 2012

Capability requested in #225.

Member

jkseppan commented Jul 1, 2012

+1

Member

pelson commented Jul 1, 2012

Note: This PR is untested.
@peterjeremy are you able to test? If not, I suggest we merge this PR and see how it fares.

Member

ivanov commented Jul 3, 2012

hang on, @pelson, I've got an alternative proposal coming shortly.

Member

ivanov commented Jul 3, 2012

ok, done, see #985 for the alternatives which removes redundancy and allows us to ignore innocent version bumps that won't otherwise break anything in the future.

Member

pelson commented Jul 3, 2012

Thanks @ivanov. I think there is a small discussion to be had on #985 which will help us decide to either merge this PR or #985.

Member

ivanov commented Jul 3, 2012

As I said in the other PR, I just don't like the idea of duplication of effort. According to this CVS history, FreeBSD has been patching this issue in their ports tree since 2008. So every time FreeBSD get a new release, they will patch it, and then we will also end up having to patch it once someone tries to build from git on FreeBSD and not from ports, and Sage is also patching it.

Member

pelson commented Jul 13, 2012

Closed in favour of #985

pelson closed this Jul 13, 2012

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment