Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make a Discourse forum the canonical location for spec discussions #1421

Closed
non-Jedi opened this issue Jul 16, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Make a Discourse forum the canonical location for spec discussions #1421

non-Jedi opened this issue Jul 16, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Comments

@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor

Documentation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EKe135LPtpLcdAoEjwIDMKoIBdq1Ev2I6hDbkTplbh0/edit?usp=sharing
Author: @non-Jedi
Date: 2018-07-16

@benparsons benparsons added proposal-ready-for-review proposal A matrix spec change proposal labels Jul 16, 2018
@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor Author

One of the alternatives discussed in this proposal is using a matrix room per proposal. Let's test that option out and keep the main thread of discussion of this proposal in #MSC1421:thebeckmeyers.xyz.

@non-Jedi
Copy link
Contributor Author

non-Jedi commented Aug 5, 2018

Superceded primarily by #1426 :). Could somebody label this as rejected when they get a chance?

@non-Jedi non-Jedi closed this as completed Aug 5, 2018
@turt2live turt2live added obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals and removed proposal-in-review labels Aug 5, 2018
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

(it's technically obsoleted by #1426, not rejected - labeled)

@turt2live turt2live added the kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success label Apr 21, 2020
RiotTranslateBot pushed a commit to RiotTranslateBot/matrix-doc that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
See matrix-org/matrix-spec#1406 for the reasoning on
this. TL;DR: the spec has always been wrong here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:core MSC which is critical to the protocol's success obsolete A proposal which has been overtaken by other proposals proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants