Skip to content

MSC2835: Add UIA to the /login endpoint#2835

Closed
Sorunome wants to merge 1 commit intomatrix-org:old_masterfrom
Sorunome:soru/uia-on-login
Closed

MSC2835: Add UIA to the /login endpoint#2835
Sorunome wants to merge 1 commit intomatrix-org:old_masterfrom
Sorunome:soru/uia-on-login

Conversation

@Sorunome
Copy link
Contributor

@Sorunome Sorunome commented Oct 28, 2020 •
edited by turt2live
Loading

Rendered

Signed-Off-By: Sorunome sorunome@famedly.com

Example implementation: https://gitlab.com/famedly/company/backend/services/uia-proxy

SCT Stuff:

FCP closure tickyboxes

No checklist.

@turt2live turt2live added kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff proposal A matrix spec change proposal proposal-in-review labels Oct 28, 2020
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Oct 30, 2020

I guess this is a proposal to fix matrix-org/matrix-spec#509. As I wrote there: I'm not sure if this is the direction we should go in.

This was referenced Jan 13, 2021
Closed
Merged
@Sorunome Sorunome mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2021
Open
@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
@uhoreg uhoreg mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2021
Merged
@cvwright
Copy link

cvwright commented Sep 29, 2021

It seems that this change will be necessary in order to enable any kind of higher-security login. Not just for #2957 but also for #3262, which is otherwise a relatively straightforward option for improving login security.

@deepbluev7 deepbluev7 mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2021
Open
@deepbluev7 deepbluev7 mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2022
Closed
@tulir
Copy link
Member

tulir commented Sep 10, 2025

With the adoption of OAuth 2.0 based authentication API (MSC3861) I don't think the SCT will plan to further improve the Matrix-specific authentication APIs. With that in mind I'm going to put this up for closure. If the author wishes to close this they can do so directly at any point.

@mscbot fcp close

@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Sep 10, 2025 •
edited by ara4n
Loading

Team member @tulir has proposed to close this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged people:

Once at least 75% of reviewers approve (and there are no outstanding concerns), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for information about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@mscbot mscbot added proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. disposition-close labels Sep 10, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Tracking for review in Spec Core Team Workflow Sep 10, 2025
@turt2live turt2live moved this from Tracking for review to Ready for FCP ticks in Spec Core Team Workflow Sep 10, 2025
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Oct 22, 2025

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@mscbot mscbot added final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Currently awaiting signoff of a majority of team members in order to enter the final comment period. labels Oct 22, 2025
@turt2live turt2live moved this from Ready for FCP ticks to In FCP in Spec Core Team Workflow Oct 22, 2025
@mscbot
Copy link
Collaborator

mscbot commented Oct 27, 2025

The final comment period, with a disposition to close, as per the review above, is now complete.

@mscbot mscbot closed this Oct 27, 2025
@mscbot mscbot removed disposition-close final-comment-period This MSC has entered a final comment period in interest to approval, postpone, or delete in 5 days. labels Oct 27, 2025
@turt2live turt2live added rejected A proposal which has been rejected for inclusion in the spec and removed finished-final-comment-period labels Oct 27, 2025
@turt2live turt2live moved this from In FCP to Merged in Spec Core Team Workflow Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal rejected A proposal which has been rejected for inclusion in the spec

Projects

Spec Core Team Workflow
Status: Merged/Done

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@Sorunome @richvdh @cvwright @tulir @mscbot @turt2live