Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC3086: Asserted identity on VoIP calls #3086

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: old_master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dbkr
Copy link
Member

@dbkr dbkr commented Apr 1, 2021

@dbkr dbkr changed the title [WIP] Proposal for asserted identity on VoIP calls MSC3086: Proposal for asserted identity on VoIP calls Apr 1, 2021
@dbkr dbkr added kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff proposal A matrix spec change proposal proposal-in-review voip labels Apr 1, 2021
@dbkr dbkr marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2021 18:09
proposals/3086-voip-asserted-identity.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
# MSC3086: Asserted Identity for VoIP Calls
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a nit but "Asserted" sounds too strong to me. Before I opened the doc I would think that it had been asserted via strong cryptography or similar, and there is a chance that someone seeing the events might think the same. Would something like "Proxied Identity", "Delegated Identity" or even "Suggested Identity" make more sens? I see that in the SIP case this talks about authenticated identities making the call (although I guess in that case the authentication isn't e2e).

Co-authored-by: Kevin Cox <kevincox@kevincox.ca>
@dbkr dbkr changed the title MSC3086: Proposal for asserted identity on VoIP calls MSC3086: Asserted identity on VoIP calls Apr 15, 2021
@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
"call_id": "thE1dofth1scallisthis5trIng",
"party_id": "abcdef",
"asserted_identity": {
"id": "@alice:rabbithole.example",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think using user_id here to be more explicit could be a bit better

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal voip
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants