Bug 1930776 updates for the implementation of userScripts.execute#44369
Open
rebloor wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Bug 1930776 updates for the implementation of userScripts.execute#44369rebloor wants to merge 1 commit into
rebloor wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
the
Content:Firefox
Contributor
|
Preview URLs (2 pages) External URLs (1)URL:
|
Rob--W
reviewed
Jun 8, 2026
Rob--W
left a comment
Rob--W
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please update the description of ScriptSource to also reference userScripts.execute in the intro at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/userScripts/ScriptSource
| ## Execution worlds | ||
|
|
||
| When a user script is registered or updated (using {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.register()")}} or {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.update()")}}), your extension can set it to run in an isolated `USER_SCRIPT` world or the `MAIN` world. | ||
| When a user script is registered, updated, or executed (using {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.register()")}}, {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.update()")}}, or {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.execute()")}}), your extension can set it to run in an isolated `USER_SCRIPT` world or the `MAIN` world. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reduced ambiguity.
Suggested change
| When a user script is registered, updated, or executed (using {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.register()")}}, {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.update()")}}, or {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.execute()")}}), your extension can set it to run in an isolated `USER_SCRIPT` world or the `MAIN` world. | |
| When a user script is registered or updated (using {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.register()")}} or {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.update()")}}) or executed (using {{WebExtAPIRef("userScripts.execute()")}}), your extension can set it to run in an isolated `USER_SCRIPT` world or the `MAIN` world. |
| <!-- ### Removals --> | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- ### Other --> | ||
| ### Other |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this "Other" header something new? We haven't used that before. I double checked the last 10 releases and we only used a list of bullet points.
Suggested change
| ### Other |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Documents the implementation of userScripts.execute() in Firefox 153 (bug 1930776).
userScripts.execute().execute()in the "Execution worlds" section and in the ExecutionWorld type description, both of which previously only referencedregister()andupdate().Related issues and pull requests
BCD changes in mdn/browser-compat-data#29811