Remove broken roadmap link

[macraig]

Pull Request

What does this PR do?

Removes the broken roadmap link

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Updates

  • Removed the Roadmap link from the header navigation for a cleaner, more streamlined menu.

• Chores

  • Minor navigation cleanup to reflect the updated header links.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Removed the Roadmap link from the README header navigation and introduced an extraneous "f" character appended to a closing </h4> tag, producing invalid HTML markup.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation update README.md	Removed Roadmap navigation link; added a stray f after a closing </h4> tag causing malformed HTML.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Area of concern:
  • README.md: remove the stray f after </h4> to restore valid HTML rendering.

Poem

🐰 A roadmap hopped away from view,
A tiny "f" then joined the crew.
Nibble it off with a careful bite,
And the header will shine once more — alight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately and specifically describes the main change: removing a broken roadmap link from the README, which matches the file summary.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch macraig-patch-1

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0d1828 and d357474.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• README.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16e4d4b and b0d1828.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)

• GitHub Check: integration-tests (Rails 6.1 with Ruby 3.2)
• GitHub Check: smoke-test
• GitHub Check: integration-tests (Rails 7 with Ruby 3.4)
• GitHub Check: integration-tests (Rails 6.1 with Ruby 3.4)
• GitHub Check: integration-tests (Rails 7 with Ruby 3.3)
• GitHub Check: integration-tests (Rails 6.1 with Ruby 3.3)
• GitHub Check: integration-tests (Rails 7 with Ruby 3.2)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.69%. Comparing base (16e4d4b) to head (d357474).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #430   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.69%   90.69%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         849      849           
=======================================
  Hits          770      770           
  Misses         79       79           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.