No description provided.
Add org-wunderlist recipe
Thanks, sorry -- I missed this because I had a busy weekend!
The symbol prefix here should really be org-wunderlist-, not org-wlist-, according to the elisp coding conventions. I also think that prefix would be clearer. What do you think?
Thank you for your response.
prefix org-wunderlist is too long. prefix should be shorter.
For instance yasnippet uses prefix yas- . I think it is appropriate.
yas is much too short, especially compared to yasnippet, so they're doing it wrong too, and setting a bad example. The conventions are there to help the community, and they only say that the prefix and filename should match: so yas would be okay if the package were called yas.el, and the org-wlist- prefix suggests that your package should be called org-wlist.el.
I'm not going to argue, but since you're the author of several packages I'd encourage you to set a good example by following the conventions. (A compromise would be to just use org-wunderlist- for the public symbols: there aren't many.)
Just let me know what you prefer.
Note that there are some really badly-behaved packages out there like multiple-cursors and its awful mc- and mc/ prefixes, so I realise I'm being picky here. :-)
I renamed wlist to wunderlist. myuhe/org-wunderlist.el@58e3695
Awesome - thanks for your patience. I really think the consistency is worth the longer identifiers.