New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest using the latest version of package-lint #4999

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 10, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@alphapapa
Contributor

alphapapa commented Sep 10, 2017

It seems like package PRs are often submitted with the package-lint box checked, but with problems that should have been detected by it. Maybe they were on an old version of package-lint. I don't upgrade my packages very often, so I'm probably guilty of this myself.

Suggest using the latest version of package-lint
It seems like package PRs are often submitted with the package-lint box checked, but with problems that should have been detected by it.  Maybe they were on an old version of package-lint.  I don't upgrade my packages very often, so I'm probably guilty of this myself.

@purcell purcell merged commit 3acf551 into melpa:master Sep 10, 2017

1 check passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@purcell

This comment has been minimized.

Member

purcell commented Sep 10, 2017

Yes! Thanks. :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment