Compared to alternatives
|Dull||VPN||Remote access software||OpenVPN||SSH / Wireguard|
|Each service tunnel can be customised by path and protocol||✓|
|Multiple layers of encryption are possible||✓|
|Use your own servers||✓||✓||✓||✓|
|Use other software with the remote connection||✓||✓||✓||✓|
|Works without a Virtual Network Adaptor||✓||✓||✓|
|Blocks invalid programs from accessing remote hosts and services||✓|
|Devices are hidden from each other by default||✓||✓||✓|
|Full site-to-site private inter networking||✓||✓||✓|
|Point-to-point private inter networking||✓||✓||✓|
|Peer to Peer||✓||✓|
|Routing through web servers (HTTP)||✓|
|Different routing for each remote TCP port||✓|
|Selectively connect to other hosts within remote networks||✓||✓|
|Integration directly into your administration and support software for innovation||✓|
|Able to use new and experimental layered encryption, like post-quantum asymmetric encryption||✓|
|Able to integrate with other tunnelling software||✓|
This table is a generalisation to show the strongest advantages of Dull. We welcome feedback and criticism to improve the accuracy of this comparison table. For corrections, please email email@example.com
Full site-to-site private inter networking
Dull doesn't currently include a Virtual Network Adaptor header. Such a header allows multiplexing of Layer 2 network traffic on a LAN, and thereby bridging two remote LANs. This kind of function is best implemented with a traditional VPN system, this is not the purpose of Dull. Dull could be used as the tunnelling framework to base such a site-to-site VPN system on. In fact, a Layer 3 implementation with routing could use a variety of Dull tunnels to comply with various rules. But for now, there is no native Virtual Network Adaptor support, nor multiplexing support.
Remote Access software
This columns is included and covers a very broad range of remote access software. If we expanded this it would be quite tedious to compare. We are thinking of very popular remote access software for this column, but also some lesser known. We have combined the features across a range of tools we know. A separate table just for comparing with remote access software would be the best approach in the future to be accurate, fair, and invite those vendors to correct any inaccuracies they might find.
This column was specifically included because it's very good and popular VPN software. As you can see in the table it accomplishes much more than what other traditional VPN systems can. We suggest that OpenVPN and MPLS are better choices enterprise internal multisite virtual private networking. For the purposes of support, that goes beyond a single organisation, Dull is more focused and accomplishes much more for such scenarios.
Refers to PPTP, L2TP and IPSec. It doesn't refer to private web browsing services.
SSH / Wireguard
These are very useful and important tools. In fact, we expect to include such tunnelling protocols in the future as duct types, particularly Wireguard. These protocols are typically used for administration of servers by system administrators. These protocols are usually implemented in a way that a client connection results in a command-line terminal user interface, but port tunnelling is also possible.