Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results missing in batch entry dropdown #1189

metas-dh opened this issue Apr 23, 2019 · 1 comment

Results missing in batch entry dropdown #1189

metas-dh opened this issue Apr 23, 2019 · 1 comment


Copy link

@metas-dh metas-dh commented Apr 23, 2019

Is this a bug or feature request?


What is the current behavior?

Only 1 product with the resp. name is displayed in the batch entry dropdown, even though there are many more.

Which are the steps to reproduce?

Try and see.

What is the expected or desired behavior?

Results of all matching products shall be displayed.

@metas-dh metas-dh added the type:bug label Apr 23, 2019
teosarca added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2019
i.e. if DisplayOnlyPositive is true and the Qty ATP is non-positive then hide the quantity but keep the product in the list

metas-ts added a commit to metasfresh/metasfresh that referenced this issue May 13, 2019
  * [#5101](#5101) Area search - Geocoding
  * [#5175](#5175) Add language parameter to SQL Function PP_Product_BOM_Recursive
  * [#5177](#5177) Checking BtM and PZN with Modulo 11
  * [#5183](#5183) Enable selective cache invalidation
  * [#78](metasfresh/metasfresh-e2e#78) Enable checking for user notifications
  * [#5172](#5172) Pricing Conditions Report Error
  * [#5182](#5182) XML externalId not sufficiently unique
  * [#5185](#5185) XML pre-existing documents are removed from XML on exporting
  * [#5186](#5186) Invoice candidate from order line candidate - pricelist precision not applied when computing PriceActual
  * [#1189](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-api#1189) Results missing in batch entry dropdown
  * [#1194](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-api#1194) Non-Mandatory BigDecimal fields inititalized with 0
  * [#79](metasfresh/metasfresh-e2e#79) Fix sales order test


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@teosarca teosarca commented Jun 7, 2019

@metas-dh closing this one because it looks like all tests were passed

@teosarca teosarca closed this Jun 7, 2019
@teosarca teosarca self-assigned this Jun 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.