Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Qty TU not correct in purchase invoice jasper #3445

Closed
metas-dh opened this issue Feb 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Qty TU not correct in purchase invoice jasper #3445

metas-dh opened this issue Feb 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees
@metas-lc @metas-dh
Labels
branch:release bug_please_use_type:bug_instead type:bug

Comments

@metas-dh
Copy link
Member

metas-dh commented Feb 5, 2018

Is this a bug or feature request?

Bug

What is the current behavior?

When you have material receipts with standalone TUs, standalone CUs and LUs with aggregated TUs, the qty TU is incorrect in the purchase invoice jasper, in the product part. Invoice itself & material receipt jasper are fine.

Material Receipt Jasper:
material receipt jasper correct

Invoice:
invoice correct

Invoice Jasper:
invoice jasper incorrect

Which are the steps to reproduce?

  1. Have material receipt candidates with >1 TU
  2. In HU Editor, use Transform: e.g. split off TUs from LU, and CU from TU so you have standalone TUs & CUs: in the case above, i had 1 LU with 3 TUs, 1 standalone TU & 1 standalone CU for both Frisée & Radiesli.

What is the expected or desired behavior?

QtyTU shall be correct in invoice jasper.
@metas-dh metas-dh mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2018
Open
@metas-lc metas-lc self-assigned this Feb 6, 2018
metas-lc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2018
@metas-lc
#3445 purchase invoice: take qtyEnteredTU from inout
4a64d35 
#3445
@metas-lc metas-lc mentioned this issue Feb 6, 2018
Merged
metas-ts added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2018
@metas-ts
Merge pull request #3447 from metasfresh/gh3445
f33cf6b 
#3445 purchase invoice: take qtyEnteredTU from inout
@metas-lc
Copy link
Contributor

metas-lc commented Feb 9, 2018

noticed that the product's qty is doubled in some cases. Taking back to check why

metas-lc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2018
@metas-lc
#3445 update docs_purchase_invoice_details function
54b4ef4 
#3445
metas-ts added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2018
@metas-ts
Update ReleaseNotes.md
3615c27 
[#3408](#3408) New Product Window for Pharma vertical
[#3445](#3445) Qty TU not correct in purchase invoice jasper
[#829](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-api-legacy#829) Planning status in manufacturing order not updated
[#3406](#3406) Set Selector in M_Product after Product Data Import
[#3458](#3458) Remove M_Storage-based legacy check from MProduct
[#3413](#3413) Credit Limit data structure as subtab in Businesspartner
[#1501](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-frontend-legacy#1501) Automated Javascript and React Testing with Jest
[#818](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-api-legacy#818) Values.valueToJsonObject() shall return JSONNullValue instead of null
[#3454](#3454) Resolve log warning "Skip setting parameter value for X_AD_PInstance_Para[0]"
[#3438](#3438) Qty LU wrong in purchase invoice candidates / invoice
[#3449](#3449) ImportHelper doesn't switch ctx
[#807](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-api-legacy#807) Quantity to invoice override callout
[#806](metasfresh/metasfresh-webui-api-legacy#806) Add to Transportation Order, Ship and Invoice action in Picking Clearing Tray not respecting the invoice schedule
metas-lc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2018
@metas-lc
#3445 put back sum on qty TU
b02037b 
#3445
@metas-lc metas-lc mentioned this issue Feb 12, 2018
Merged
@metas-dh metas-dh self-assigned this Feb 21, 2018
@metas-dh
Copy link
Member Author

metas-dh commented Feb 21, 2018 •
edited

Results of IT1
tested in mf15

  • repeated testcase from above: qties TU in invoice jasper correct: OK
  • used different types of TU for the same material receipt candidate: qties in material receipt jasper are ok, also in the invoice, but not in the invoice jasper: NOK

material receipt:
2018-02-21 14_25_19-184_1000020 pdf

invoice:
2018-02-21 14_27_58-metasfresh

invoice jasper:
2018-02-21 14_24_59-183_1000004 pdf

@metas-lc
Copy link
Contributor

devtest

  • invoice without HU
  • order 1 product - 1 inout with 2 different TUs (use split/transform for that) - invoice
  • order multiple products - multiple inouts - multiple HUs (transform) - invoice

metas-lc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2018
@metas-lc
#3445 update purchase invoice details sql
71b8afe 
#3445
@metas-lc metas-lc mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2018
Merged
@metas-dh
Copy link
Member Author

metas-dh commented Mar 6, 2018

Results of IT2
tested in mf15

  • repeated testcase from above: qties TU in invoice jasper correct: OK
  • used different types of TU for the same material receipt candidate: qties in material receipt jasper are ok, also in the invoice, but not in the invoice jasper: OK
    => different TU types are listed together in product line, w/ overall sum, but in Gebinde the resp. qties are shown: OK

had an issue w/ one of the TUs missing at first in the invoice (tax issue: solved), but this subject will be checked again in #3545

@metas-dh metas-dh closed this as completed Mar 6, 2018
@metas-lc metas-lc mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@metas-lc metas-lc

@metas-dh metas-dh

Labels
branch:release bug_please_use_type:bug_instead type:bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@teosarca @metas-ts @metas-lc @metas-dh