Skip to content

Conversation

@jimmo
Copy link
Member

@jimmo jimmo commented Jun 1, 2023

If a port had md5 enabled, then it would no longer be available.

Retain the existing logic of using the built-in preferentially.

This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors.

If a port had md5 enabled, then it would no longer be available.

Retain the existing logic of using the built-in preferentially.

This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors.

Signed-off-by: Jim Mussared <jim.mussared@gmail.com>
Copy link

@KipCrossing KipCrossing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - although there is no easy way for me to test this (that I know of yet)

@jimmo
Copy link
Member Author

jimmo commented Jun 1, 2023

Closing in favour of #675

@jimmo jimmo closed this Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants