Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MergeTree: Support Local References in TrackingGroups #11778

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

anthony-murphy
Copy link
Contributor

@anthony-murphy anthony-murphy commented Sep 1, 2022

Description

This change add support for LocalReferencePositions to TrackingGroups and their underlying sorted segment set. This will allow tracking removed segments with LocalReferencePositions for undo redo, which will be both more accurate and result in less tree fragmentation than the existing method of maintaining and tracking removed segments in the tree itself.

Other information or known dependencies

AB#45
AB#147
AB#151

@github-actions github-actions bot added area: dds Issues related to distributed data structures public api change Changes to a public API base: next PRs targeted against next branch labels Sep 1, 2022
@anthony-murphy anthony-murphy requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2022 17:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added area: dds: sharedstring area: framework Framework is a tag for issues involving the developer framework. Eg Aqueduct labels Sep 1, 2022
@msfluid-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

msfluid-bot commented Sep 1, 2022

Could not find a usable baseline build with search starting at CI 389efb2

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 6c038bd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: dds: sharedstring area: dds Issues related to distributed data structures area: framework Framework is a tag for issues involving the developer framework. Eg Aqueduct base: next PRs targeted against next branch public api change Changes to a public API
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants