Skip to content

Truly Conversational Search is the next logic step in the journey to generate intelligent and useful AI. To understand what this may mean, researchers have voiced a continuous desire to study how people currently converse with search engines. Traditionally, the desire to produce such a comprehensive dataset has been limited because those who hav…


Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings


Repository files navigation


A Family of datasets built using technology and Data from Microsoft's Bing.

MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset Paper URL :

MS MARCO(Microsoft Machine Reading Comprehension) is a large scale dataset focused on machine reading comprehension, question answering, and passage ranking, Keyphrase Extraction, and Conversational Search Studies, or what the community thinks would be useful.

First released at NIPS 2016, the current dataset has 1,010,916 unique real queries that were generated by sampling and anonymizing Bing usage logs. The dataset started off focusing on QnA but has since evolved to focus on any problem related to search. For task specifics please explore some of the tasks that have been built out of the dataset. If you think there is a relevant task we have missed please open an issue explaining your ideas?

For more information about TREC 2019 Deep Learning

For more information about Q&A

For more information about Ranking

For more information about Keyphrase Extraction

For more information about Conversational Search

For more information about Polite Crawling

Dataset Generation, Data Format, And Statistics

What is the difference between MSMARCO and other MRC datasets? We believe the advantages that are special to MSMARCO are:

  • Real questions: All questions have been sample from real anonymized bing queries.
  • Real Documents: Most Url's that we have source the passages from contain the full web documents. These can be used as extra contextual information to improve systems or be used to compete in our expert task.
  • Human Generated Answers: All questions have an answer written by a human. If there was no answer in the passages the judge read they have written 'No Answer Present.'
  • Human Generated Well-Formed: Some questions contain extra human evaluation to create well formed answers that could be used by intelligent agents like Cortana, Siri, Google Assistant, and Alexa.
  • Dataset Size: At over 1 million queries the dataset is large enough to train the most complex systems and also sample the data for specific applications.

Download the Dataset

To Download the MSMARCO Dataset please navigate to and agree to our Terms and Conditions. If there is some data you think we are missing and would be useful please open an issue.

Conversational Search

Truly Conversational Search is the next logic step in the journey to generate intelligent and useful AI. To understand what this may mean, researchers have voiced a continuous desire to study how people currently converse with search engines.


Traditionally, the desire to produce such a comprehensive dataset has been limited because those who have this data (Search Engines) have a responsibility to their users to maintain their privacy and cannot share the data publicly in a way that upholds the trusts users have in the Search Engines. Given these two powerful forces we believe we have a dataset and paradigm that meets both sets of needs: A artificial public dataset that approximates the true data and an ability to evaluate model performance on the real user behavior. What this means is we released a public dataset which is generated by creating artificial sessions using embedding similarity and will test on the original data. To say this again: we are not releasing any private user data but are releasing what we believe to be a good representation of true user interactions.

Corpus Generation

To generate our projection corpus, we took the 1,010,916 MSMARCO queries and generated the query vectors for each unique queries. Once we had these embedding spaces, we build an Approximate Nearest Neighbor Index using ANNOY. Next, we sampled our Bing usage log from 2018-06-01 to 2018-11-30 to find a sample of sessions that that had more than 1 query, shared a query that had a query embedding similar to a MSMARCO query, and were likely to be conversational in nature. Next we remove all navigation, bot, junk, and adult sessions. Once we did this, we now had 45,040,730 unique user sessions of 344,147 unique queries. The average session was 2.6 queries long and the longest session was 160 queries. Just like we did for our public queries, we generated embedding for each unique query. Finally, in order to merge the two, for each unique session we perform a nearest neighbor search given the real queries query vector in the MSMARCO ANN Index. This allows us to join the public queries to the private sessions generating an artificial user session grounded in true user behavior.

An example of these search sessions is below.

marco-gen-dev-40        what is the australian flag     what is the population of australia     what hemisphere is north australia                                                                       how big is sydney australia      is australia a country
marco-gen-dev-152       is elements on a periodic table what is the product of ch4      cost of solar system    what constellation is cassiopeia in                                                      what is the human skeleton       what is a isosceles triangle    convert a fraction to a % calculator    standard deviation difference calculator                                                         graph y = 1/2 x cubed how to     what is the volume of a pyramid what is american sign language definition       how to put word count on word
marco-gen-dev-157       define colonialism      what are migrant workers        office 365 cost to add a user   what does per capita means                                                               what are tariffs definition for tariffs  define urbanization
marco-gen-dev-218       icd 10 code rhinitis    icd diagnosis code for cva      icd code for psoriatic arthritis       icd 10 code for facet arthritis of knee                                           icd 10 code for copd     icd codes for cad       icd diagnosis code for cva      icd 10 code for personal history pvd
marco-gen-dev-385       circadian activity rhythms definition   what is the synonym of insomnia insomnia definition    define narcolepsy                                                                 causes for night terrors types of meditation     definition: meditation  pros and cons for death penalty
marco-gen-dev-397       cost of solar system    what is the hottest planet?     what is coldest planet  what is solar system is                                                                          what kind of galaxy is the milky way     spanish iris is what in english
marco-gen-dev-457       can we repeal donald trump      what was barack obama   is john mccain a republican     who is chuck schumer's daughter                                                          was bill clinton a democrat      is mike pence a veteran why did barack obama get a nobel peace prize    was mahatma gandhi awarded a peace prize                                                         why did dalai lama win the nobel peace prize
marco-gen-dev-485       definition of technology        define scientific method        definition of constant  graphs definition                                                                        definition of information technology     define axis     definition of  trial    legal definition of bias        define what an inference is
marco-gen-dev-496       illusory definition     illusion vs allusion definition declaration + definition        define: caste                                                                            define rhetoric  define race
marco-gen-dev-572       stock price tesla       fb stock price  home depot stock price t        amazon stock price     nxp semiconductors stock price

We first release BERT Based Sessions and Query Embedding Based Sessions which we shared with a small group of researchers to get feedback on what worked better. Based on community feedback and data exploration our we are releasing our first full scale dataset described below.

  1. Split the 45,040,730 artificial sessions into a train, dev and test. To do so, any session that included a query from the QnA eval set was considered eval and the remaining sessions were split 90%/10% between train and dev. These files are called full_marco_sessions_ann_split.* and have the following sizes
spacemanidol@spacemanidol:/mnt/c/Users/dacamp/Desktop$ wc -l full_marco_sessions_ann_split.*
   8480280 full_marco_sessions_ann_split.test.tsv
  32903744 full_marco_sessions_ann_split.train.tsv
  45040730 total
  1. Use the query vectors to generate a similairty score between edges and filter out four types of edges
    • Topic Change: (cosine similarity) <= 0.4
    • Explore: (cosine similarity) \in (0.4, 0.7]
    • Specify: (cosine similarity) \in (0.7, 0.85]
    • Paraphrase: (cosine similarity) \in (0.85, 1]
  2. Filter by session coherence
    • treat "topic change" as non-related and no edge,
    • build the graph in each session,
    • pick the biggest sub-graph in the session,
    • throw away the rest queries not in the biggest sub-graph
  3. Filter by session length removing anything with less than 4 queries.
  4. Filter any session where the chain of queries were just paraphrases

Upon doing this, we have 3 sets of files: Train,Dev, and eval. We are not currently sharing eval. Explicit size numbers below

   774724 marco_ann_session.test.all.tsv
   675334 marco_ann_session.train.all.tsv
  1525251 total

To provide more exploratory content, we further filter the sessions in each split(Train, Dev, Eval) using three types of filtering:

  1. ".half_trans.jsonl": half (explore|specifiy) >= 50% adjacent edges in (0.4, 0.85]
  2. ".half_explore.jsonl": half (explore): >= 50% adjacent edges in (0.4, 0.7]
  3. ".half_specify.jsonl": half (specifiy): >= 50% adjacent edges in (0.7, 0.85]

Explicit size numbers below

 spacemanidol@spacemanidol:/mnt/c/Users/dacamp/Desktop$ wc -l marco_ann_session.*.half*
   548101 marco_ann_session.test.half_explore.tsv
    42032 marco_ann_session.test.half_specify.tsv
   648868 marco_ann_session.test.half_trans.tsv
   482021 marco_ann_session.train.half_explore.tsv
    50980 marco_ann_session.train.half_specify.tsv
   572791 marco_ann_session.train.half_trans.tsv
  2468084 total

Corpus task

We are currently assembling baselines and building an evaluation framework but the initial task will be as follows: Given a chain of queries q1, q2,...,q(n-1) predict q(n). Ideally systems will train and test on the public artificial and will be evaluated on both the private real data and public artificial eval data.

Initial 500k Sample Process

  1. Downloaded the data
  1. Generate the querySets
python <msmarco train queries> <msmarco dev queries> <msmarco eval queries> <quoraQueries> <NQFolder>
  1. Get Query Embeddings
python <url> allQueries.tsv queryEmbeddings.tsv
  1. Generate BERT Query Embeddings To generate our Query Embeddings we used BERT As A Service to generate a unique query embedding for each query in our set. If you want to go ahead and regenerate embeddings(or use it to generate another alternate query source for you model) you can follow what we did below.
cd Data/BERT
pip install bert-serving-server  # server
pip install bert-serving-client  # client, independent of `bert-serving-server`
unzip cased_L-24_H-1024_A-16
bert-serving-start -model_dir ~/Data/BERT/cased_L-24_H-1024_A-16  -num_worker=4 -device_map 0 #depending on your computer play around with these settings

In a separate shell

python3 allQueries.tsv BERTQueryEmbeddings.tsv
  1. Generate Sessions
python realQueries queryEmbeddings.tsv BERTQueryEmbeddings.tsv queryEmbeddings.ann sessions.tsv


This project welcomes contributions and suggestions. Most contributions require you to agree to a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) declaring that you have the right to, and actually do, grant us the rights to use your contribution. For details, visit

When you submit a pull request, a CLA-bot will automatically determine whether you need to provide a CLA and decorate the PR appropriately (e.g., label, comment). Simply follow the instructions provided by the bot. You will only need to do this once across all repos using our CLA.

This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. For more information see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact with any additional questions or comments.


Truly Conversational Search is the next logic step in the journey to generate intelligent and useful AI. To understand what this may mean, researchers have voiced a continuous desire to study how people currently converse with search engines. Traditionally, the desire to produce such a comprehensive dataset has been limited because those who hav…



Code of conduct

Security policy





No releases published


No packages published