Fix unbox_value_or problems with explicit type and implicit hstring #656
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In a call to
unbox_value_or<T>(obj, def), if the second parameter happens to be a valid constructor parameter forparam::hstring, then the hstring version ofunbox_value_orwill be used, even though the user clearly wantsT.Add an explicit
enable_ifto remove the hstring version if the template parameter is nothstring.There's the converse problem, where you want
unbox_value_orto inferhstring, but it can't:Add a default type
hstringforTin the hstring version ofunbox_value_or.