Skip to content

Conversation

@jeremyVignelles
Copy link
Contributor

@jeremyVignelles jeremyVignelles commented Jan 20, 2020

I didn't understand the doc at first, because the \ was missing and the <i> was visible. This change clarifies the syntax.
If you prefer to keep the italics semantic instead, I'm fine with that too, but fix that properly.

I didn't understand the doc at first, because the \ was missing and the <i> was visible. This change clarifies the syntax.
If you prefer to keep the italics semantic instead, I'm fine with that too, but fix that properly.
@PRMerger12
Copy link

@jeremyVignelles : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@namazso
Copy link
Contributor

namazso commented Jan 22, 2020

you could've simply escaped the backslashes by inserting another backslash, which in turn would make the italics work

@jeremyVignelles
Copy link
Contributor Author

Feel free to open another PR and close this one then. I don't have any strong feeling on that matter.

Utilizing markdown syntax.
@hkhmsft hkhmsft merged commit 100a99a into MicrosoftDocs:docs Jan 29, 2020
@hkhmsft
Copy link
Contributor

hkhmsft commented Jan 29, 2020

Thanks for your contribution, I've merged your changes and they should be live soon.

@PRMerger9
Copy link

@lastnameholiu : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

xiaoyinl added a commit to xiaoyinl/sdk-api that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2020
See MicrosoftDocs#46. I think the convention is to only italicize variable names. The `ServiceName` should be changed to the actual name of the service, but `NT SERVICE` should not, so it seems we'd better not italicize `NT SERVICE`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants