Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Application with instance id GUID is not registered in APS store #62

Closed
juveinfo opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 10 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@juveinfo
Copy link

commented May 13, 2019

Issue: What's Aps Store? How to configure?
My Request URL, something like this:
https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/app/onlineMeetings/6fd19438-xxxx-416b-8007-99057975970c_19:meeting_XXX@thread.v2

@ksikorsk

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 13, 2019

Hello,

GET /onlineMeetings has a very specific use case that is only valid if you have a VTC license. It is not meant to be used to look up a meeting by the thread id.

What are you looking to do with this endpoint?

@ksikorsk ksikorsk added the invalid label May 13, 2019

@juveinfo

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented May 14, 2019

Thanks for your reply @ksikorsk
We want to have the backend service to create meeting, and redirect the meeting joinUrl to our portal, in order to enduser:

  1. click the joinUrl to participate the meeting.
  2. other participants could be invited automatically.
    BTW, when the onlinemeetings and calls API plan to release GA version?
@ksikorsk

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 14, 2019

GA is scheduled for June/July. We're working on finalizing the APIs now.

For your scenario, why do you have the thread id in the URI? That is not needed to create a meeting.

The URI should be:
POST https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/app/onlineMeetings
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/application-post-onlinemeetings?view=graph-rest-beta&tabs=cs

GET https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/app/onlineMeetings/{id} is only supported if you have created a meeting (above) and have the actual meeting id (not the thread id as you have in your example).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/onlinemeeting-get?view=graph-rest-beta&tabs=cs

@ksikorsk ksikorsk closed this May 14, 2019

@tpmeredith

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 23, 2019

GA is scheduled for June/July. We're working on finalizing the APIs now.

For your scenario, why do you have the thread id in the URI? That is not needed to create a meeting.

The URI should be:
POST https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/app/onlineMeetings
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/application-post-onlinemeetings?view=graph-rest-beta&tabs=cs

GET https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/app/onlineMeetings/{id} is only supported if you have created a meeting (above) and have the actual meeting id (not the thread id as you have in your example).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/onlinemeeting-get?view=graph-rest-beta&tabs=cs

Will the API finally allow developers to support CTI integrations with teams? This is a major lacking feature for orgs who switched to teams, especially with SfB EoL targeting April 1st, 2020 as there are virtually zero 'working' CTI integrations with teams. I'm told by numerous developers the beta API is still missing key features to make this happen. For us we use whole MS stack (dynamics, etc) and its painful to not have a call CTI integration from MS teams to MS dynamics.

@ksikorsk

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented May 23, 2019

I misspoke on the dates, I've been told we're targeting end of Q3 for API release.

@VinodRavichandran can speak to CTI integrations and which APIs are targeted for release.

@tpmeredith

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jun 12, 2019

I misspoke on the dates, I've been told we're targeting end of Q3 for API release.

@VinodRavichandran can speak to CTI integrations and which APIs are targeted for release.

Hi Vinod are you able to say if the upcoming API's will allow functionality of CTI for inbound call popup integrations in teams? Ideally it would be awesome if teams finally supported a webhook of some sorts for VoIP/calling.

@VinodRavichandran

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jun 13, 2019

Yes it should be. You can refer to this video to see how Informacast Bot puts up an incoming call into Teams. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ0B-vYRP1g

@tpmeredith

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jun 14, 2019

Hi VinodRavichandran I could be missing something but in looking at that youtube video as well as their website, it does not seem to work for inbound calls for teams. It looks like they have to manually type an alert with that bot/app command and then that initiates a call to a team (or just a meeting really?).

What is desperately needed for our company and I'm sure many others is the ability to have either a webhook notification for incoming calls that can extract key details of the call such as CID, DID, user receipient, etc. Either that or the ability in graphs API to have notification of inbound call. Not to just initiate a call otherwise CTI for inbound call popups would not work.

I've spoken to numerous developers from different MS partners and they all say the same thing that this functionality, even in the existing beta API, is not currently possible with teams leaving a big void for VoIP in SfB to Teams.

@VinodRavichandran

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jun 14, 2019

Hi @tpmeredith, Thanks for clarifying the scenario. We are working on defining the E2E experience for Calling/Meeting events and would like to get some inputs on the scenario that you had in SFB and now planning for Teams. Can you send me an email at vin@microsoft.com to tell me more about your scenario/use case that your company is implementing?

@tpmeredith

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented Jun 21, 2019

Thanks Vinod our developers and I shot you a few emails, did you receive them? Thanks again,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.