Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blog idea: Who is "we"? #147

Open
Mikaela opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Mikaela
Copy link
Owner

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 2, 2019

It's an idea that has bothered me in the shower at least twice. The blog should mention some projects from my past that don't need naming and being part of the "we" and being outside of it. NVC is important to mention too, and people who appear out of nowhere to be "we" and others that don't appear so much out of nowhere, but are also "we". I guess the books by Jaron Lanier should also be referred to on an individual/pack switch, but maybe I should finish reading this book first, even if I am reading them in reverse order.

@Mikaela Mikaela added the blog label Jul 2, 2019
@Mikaela Mikaela self-assigned this Jul 2, 2019
Mikaela added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2019
Ref: #147
@Mikaela

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 8, 2019

The first reviewer gives me this definition:

"we" used in internet discussions as "«I and all right-thinking people» (in practice meaning, probably, «I alone»)" 😉

@Mikaela

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 8, 2019

I am told that the SUMUTIN paragraph above the bulleted list and the bulleted list are too loosely connected and my proposal to remedy the sitatuion was accepted:

would it be enough to say that the imageboard person cannot afterwards explain why they did it and that they just went along the pack and now they are apologetical as the reporter could destroy their live and they didn't think them as a real person?

However I need to reread the article has it has been months and I just skimmed it this time, so I don't accidentally start lying in the summary.

@Mikaela

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 8, 2019

Oh and it turns out I have made some placeholder links that actually lead nowhere, so that is something to fix for release.

@Mikaela

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 8, 2019

Also Facebook* is confusing, I should specify that I mean Facebook and other services owned by them (Messenger, WhatsApp, Instagram and I never was in Oculus).

@Mikaela

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 8, 2019

I am failing with English prepositions(?) and I want "on GitHub" instead of "at GitHub" as the later may make people think I am working there or everything has happened in GitHub office, which is not the case.

@Mikaela

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner Author

@Mikaela Mikaela commented Jul 8, 2019

Remember to read direct chats at Riot with the reviewers

@Mikaela Mikaela pinned this issue Jul 13, 2019
@Mikaela Mikaela added the draft label Sep 26, 2019
@Mikaela Mikaela unpinned this issue Sep 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.