Mikeal Rogers mikeal

Organizations

@request @linuxfoundation @nearform @nodecopter @knode @nodeschool @node-forward @linuxfoundationorg @oneshot @jsfest @iojs
mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1484
@mikeal

I like them as is, we have a condesned version for the weekly update if people want something simpler. On Friday, April 24, 2015, Rod Vagg notifica…

mikeal commented on issue juliangruber/keypair#6
@mikeal

ya, i kinda forgot how i did it though and can't seem to find that code anywhere :)

mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

yes and no. the V8 team seems to be paying attention to asm.js benchmarks. They don't have native support (they aren't interpreting asm.js any diff…

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1494
@mikeal

It looks like there's a lot of ecosystem work going around i18n. @srl295 has published icu npm packages there's the existing ecma402 polyfill gl…

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1502
@mikeal

Just as a point of process, I don't think we've got 24 hours on the latest nominations for @mscdex and @shigeki so, if there are objections, we'll …

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1484
@mikeal

@rvagg well, the full changelog is usually longer than we like the entire weekly update to be. we don't talk about any of the bugfixes and we take …

mikeal commented on issue iojs/NG#7
@mikeal

I think in general, the error (handling) system for fs and similar operations is very raw, and that probably the big pain point. Yup, this bit us…

mikeal commented on issue iojs/NG#13
@mikeal

this shouldn't be in NG, we should do this in the current generation of the platform :)

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1484
@mikeal

When we do the weekly updates we tend to condense the information about them in to a more human readable form that is quicker to get the gist of.

mikeal commented on issue iojs/NG#8
@mikeal

would like to just make a shout to @mscdex because iojs/io.js#1457 is awesome. hopefully it would pave the future for http2 support. :D:D I have …

mikeal commented on pull request jasnell/dev-policy#63
@mikeal

I've appreciated the in-progress label. I can't entirely describe why I find it so useful but it definitely helps my mental model of what the purpo…

mikeal opened issue iojs/io.js#1494
@mikeal
Adopt globalize for i18n
mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

toLowerCase() test is 40% slower than case independent regexp. don't we eat .toLowerCase() anyway when we create the headers object later?

mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

As far as the spec is concerned new verbs can be added at any time and it's not the parsers job to fail on any specific verb except where semantics…

mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

For reference, here's one of my favorites http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-dusseault-caldav-05.html#METHOD_MKCALENDAR CalDAV's MKCALENDAR eve…

mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

Can we move to a model where we just support any method? I argued with ry back in the day about this, but people at the IETF add HTTP methods for c…

@mikeal

from the PR "Like libuv does." which appears to be done in this change libuv/libuv@85124d7

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1436
@mikeal

+1 On Friday, April 17, 2015, Rod Vagg notifications@github.com wrote: @chrisdickinson https://github.com/chrisdickinson perhaps the easiest way a…

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1436
@mikeal

Did the OpenSSL change alter the ABI or are we doing this in order to force a recompile of addons that happen to be compiled for OpenSSL? With 2.0 …

mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

two things this is deprecating process.binding('http_parser') which means we're gonna break some people, maybe too many to be able to remove this …

mikeal commented on pull request iojs/io.js#1457
@mikeal

Crazy excited about this.

mikeal commented on pull request jasnell/dev-policy#61
@mikeal

Right, we can do that prior, and it's especially important that we do that to see if there are any objections to certain groups being considered "C…

mikeal commented on pull request jasnell/dev-policy#61
@mikeal

We should figure that out before we vote to merge. AFAIK none of them conflict though, but all the ones marked as "Core" will need to vote for a TS…

mikeal commented on issue iojs/io.js#1297
@mikeal

Kill this issue, we'll start a new one later once the documentation is done.

mikeal commented on issue jasnell/dev-policy#39
@mikeal

Yes, those are the companies we reached out to with standard questions. Most of them responded (but not 100%). it seems that a large number of par…

mikeal commented on issue iojs/evangelism#61
@mikeal

OH I SEE! :) Let's open a new one that doesn't have this history of us figuring out what this issue should be :)

mikeal commented on issue jasnell/dev-policy#39
@mikeal

BTW, this was the easiest way for us to get feedback form a large section of the community. It is somewhat optimized for our own convenience and yo…

mikeal commented on issue jasnell/dev-policy#39
@mikeal

The biggest thread we had was the "pain points" thread: iojs/roadmap#1 Which I eventually distilled in to a wordcloud iojs/roadmap#1 (comment) The …

mikeal commented on issue iojs/evangelism#61
@mikeal

Can we just rename the other one, it has all the content in it?

mikeal closed issue iojs/evangelism#61
@mikeal
Evangelism: Weekly Update April 17th