Skip to content

Conversation

@jonathanMindee
Copy link
Contributor

PR Details

Description

Removed existing pdf file handling and use pikepdf.

How Has This Been Tested

Tests were all passed and more were added.
Manual testing on 30 pdf invoices were done to ensure extraction quality.

Types of changes

  • Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@ianardee ianardee force-pushed the pikepdf branch 4 times, most recently from f81e569 to 7dda163 Compare January 17, 2022 08:32
@ianardee ianardee linked an issue Jan 17, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@ianardee ianardee merged commit 2128ef0 into main Jan 17, 2022
@ianardee ianardee deleted the pikepdf branch January 17, 2022 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Find pymupdf alternative

3 participants