Repository for the paper AI-Generated Virtual Instructors Based on Liked or Admired People Can Improve Motivation and Foster Positive Emotions for Learning
Supplementary material for the paper can be found in the Supplementary Material folder.
Table 1.1: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Liking (Like) of the experimental group and control. Since the Assumption of Equal Variances was met, p-values are calculated with a basic ANOVA test and no significance was found.
| Quiz Score - Degree of Liking | ||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||
| Like Grp. 1 (S.d) | Like Grp. 2 (S.d) | Like Grp. 3 (S.d) | Like Control (S.d) | |
| Like Grp. 1 | 12.9 (5.7) // 12.9 (5.7) | 12.9 (5.7) // 13.0 (6.8) | 12.9 (5.7) // 13.9 (5.6) | 12.9 (5.7) // 12.9 (6.7) |
| Like Grp. 2 | 13.0 (6.8) // 12.9 (5.7) | 13.0 (6.8) // 13.0 (6.8) | 13.0 (6.8) // 3.9 (5.6) | 13.0 (6.8) // 12.9 (6.7) |
| Like Grp. 3 | 3.9 (5.6) // 12.9 (5.7) | 3.9 (5.6) // 13.0 (6.8) | 3.9 (5.6) // 3.9 (5.6) | 3.9 (5.6) // 12.9 (6.7) |
| Like Control | 12.9 (6.7) // 12.9 (5.7) | 12.9 (6.7) // 13.0 (6.8) | 12.9 (6.7) // 3.9 (5.6) | 12.9 (6.7) // 12.9 (6.7) |
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .05) than the control group. Double asterisk (**) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .01) than the control group.
Table 1.2: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Admiration (Adm) groups of the experimental group and control. Since significance are found with a One-way ANOVA test, P-values are calculated with a Tukey post-hoc test.
| Quiz Score - Degree of Admiration | ||||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||||
| Adm Grp. 1 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 2 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 3 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 4 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 5 (S.d) | Adm Control (S.d) | |
| Adm Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 4 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 5 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .05) than the control group. Double asterisk (**) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .01) than the control group.
Table 1.1: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Liking (Like) of the experimental group and control. Since the Assumption of Equal Variances was met, p-values are calculated with a basic ANOVA test and no significance was found.
| L1 - Degree of Liking | ||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||
| Like Grp. 1 (S.d) | Like Grp. 2 (S.d) | Like Grp. 3 (S.d) | Like Control (S.d) | |
| Like Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .05) than the control group. Double asterisk (**) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .01) than the control group.
Table 1.2: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Admiration (Adm) groups of the experimental group and control. Since significance are found with a One-way ANOVA test, P-values are calculated with a Tukey post-hoc test.
| L1 - Degree of Admiration | ||||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||||
| Adm Grp. 1 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 2 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 3 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 4 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 5 (S.d) | Adm Control (S.d) | |
| Adm Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 4 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 5 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Table 1.1: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Liking (Like) of the experimental group and control. Since the Assumption of Equal Variances was met, p-values are calculated with a basic ANOVA test and no significance was found.
| L3 - Degree of Liking | ||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||
| Like Grp. 1 (S.d) | Like Grp. 2 (S.d) | Like Grp. 3 (S.d) | Like Control (S.d) | |
| Like Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .05) than the control group. Double asterisk (**) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .01) than the control group.
Table 1.2: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Admiration (Adm) groups of the experimental group and control. Since significance are found with a One-way ANOVA test, P-values are calculated with a Tukey post-hoc test.
| L3 - Degree of Admiration | ||||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||||
| Adm Grp. 1 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 2 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 3 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 4 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 5 (S.d) | Adm Control (S.d) | |
| Adm Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 4 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 5 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Table 1.1: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Liking (Like) of the experimental group and control. Since the Assumption of Equal Variances was met, p-values are calculated with a basic ANOVA test and no significance was found.
| L5 - Degree of Liking | ||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||
| Like Grp. 1 (S.d) | Like Grp. 2 (S.d) | Like Grp. 3 (S.d) | Like Control (S.d) | |
| Like Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .05) than the control group. Double asterisk (**) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .01) than the control group.
Table 1.2: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Admiration (Adm) groups of the experimental group and control. Since significance are found with a One-way ANOVA test, P-values are calculated with a Tukey post-hoc test.
| L5 - Degree of Admiration | ||||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||||
| Adm Grp. 1 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 2 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 3 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 4 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 5 (S.d) | Adm Control (S.d) | |
| Adm Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 4 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 5 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Table 1.1: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Liking (Like) of the experimental group and control. Since the Assumption of Equal Variances was met, p-values are calculated with a basic ANOVA test and no significance was found.
| L5 - Degree of Liking | ||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||
| Like Grp. 1 (S.d) | Like Grp. 2 (S.d) | Like Grp. 3 (S.d) | Like Control (S.d) | |
| Like Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Like Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
Note: Asterisk (*) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .05) than the control group. Double asterisk (**) indicates score is significantly different (at p < .01) than the control group.
Table 1.2: Mean quiz scores with standard deviation (S.d) for the Degree of Admiration (Adm) groups of the experimental group and control. Since significance are found with a One-way ANOVA test, P-values are calculated with a Tukey post-hoc test.
| L5 - Degree of Admiration | ||||||
| Task | Treatment | Control | ||||
| Adm Grp. 1 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 2 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 3 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 4 (S.d) | Adm Grp. 5 (S.d) | Adm Control (S.d) | |
| Adm Grp. 1 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 2 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 3 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 4 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Grp. 5 | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
| Adm Control | 1.11 | 2.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 | 3.11** | 4.11 |
@misc{githubMitmedialabAIGeneratedVirtualInstructors,
author = {Pat Pataranutaporn and Joanne Leong and Valdemar Danry and Alyssa P. Lawson and Pattie Maes and Misha Sra},
title = {Supplementary Material: AI-Generated Virtual Instructors Based on Liked or Admired People Can Improve Motivation and Foster Positive Emotions for Learning,
howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/mitmedialab/AI-Generated-Virtual-Instructors}},
year = {2022},
note = {[Accessed 01-Aug-2022]},
}