Michael J Gruber mjg

@mjg
mjg pushed to for-each-object at mjg/git
@mjg
  • @mjg 5c774ca
    git for-each-ref: allow general objects
mjg pushed to pre-merge-hook at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to show-no-prune at mjg/git
@mjg
  • @mjg e1bae66
    builtin/show: do not prune by pathspec
mjg created branch index-read-write-error at mjg/git
mjg pushed to pre-merge-hook at mjg/git
@mjg
@mjg
mjg pushed to show-no-prune at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to for-each-object at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to next at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to master at mjg/git
@mjg
@mjg
mjg pushed to next at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to pre-merge-hook at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to show-no-prune at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to for-each-object at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to master at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg commented on issue zhukov/webogram#788
@mjg

Can the app deal with two accounts being used simultaneously? Having at least two (1 business, 1 personal) would be nice to keep identities separat…

mjg pushed to master at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to show-no-prune at mjg/git
@mjg
@mjg
mjg pushed to next at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to for-each-object at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg pushed to pre-merge-hook at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg commented on commit KarthikNayak/git@8ebacb5f9c
@mjg

As a superficial reviewer, I'm wondering whether what you are doing is more like "factor out the filter logic from for_each_ref.c into ref_filter.c".

mjg commented on commit KarthikNayak/git@a64793bf4e
@mjg

Maybe reword the commit message to say something like: Rename the struct refinfo members to be more in line with other similar structures.

mjg pushed to master at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg created branch apache2.4 at mjg/git
mjg pushed to next at mjg/git
@mjg
mjg starred empet/Math