New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should Lua be vendored like it is? #22
Comments
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
|
Ideally, it’d be nice to keep it in a submodule or otherwise included as a dependency of some kind. I’m very, very new to Cocoa development, so I don’t know how best it’s done in this ecosystem. In the Ruby world, we’d specify the dependency in a bundler Gemfile, then vendor the gem when shipping. Similarly, in a Maven project for Java or Scala, a dependency is cached locally and then included in the shipped jar file or directory with a gaggle of jar files. What is done in the Cocoa toolset? I heard of CocoaPods, but I don’t know a whole lot about it. |
|
From that, there's also this, but I think you've already integrated with Lua itself, rather than using a bridge: |
|
CocoaPods analog to a Which apparently seems likely: http://cocoapods.org/?q=lua |
|
Seems that perhaps that Lua.framework package I linked to might be ripe for some fixin’... |
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
|
Fair enough. On June 21, 2014 6:25:07 AM EDT, Steven Degutis notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
Just to add a comment in case anyone revisits this... The author of Lua.framework has some builds available here and is looking into why it doesn't compile at the moment here: derkyjadex/Lua-Framework#1. |
I found this framework bundle that might be a more idomatic way to ship it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: