Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it true that you didn't train the parameters of VGG16? #28

Closed
Mistariano opened this issue Dec 25, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Is it true that you didn't train the parameters of VGG16? #28

Mistariano opened this issue Dec 25, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@Mistariano
Copy link

Hi,

Thank you very much for the brilliant work. :)

I just wonder why you set the parameters of VGG16 as constants:

return tf.constant(self.data_dict[name][0], name="filter")

According to the paper, the objective function minimizes both W and w, but it seems like you only minimized w

@mengxingkong
Copy link

i have the same question, had you resolved it?

@sandhawalia
Copy link
Member

Initially to train faster we didn't fine-tune the Convnet backbone. Initially we just train the HED head. One can fine-tune the model one the deconv layers are trained.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants