New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modelica.Mechanics.MultiBody.Joints.Prismatic - s_offset - constant vs parameter #2465
Comments
By the way the Evaluate Annotation is only specified for a component declared with the prefix parameter. See Spec. 18.3 Evaluate. |
It looks like a bug introduced by c025e05. Note that |
No, this is not a bug, but a feature. The reason is that I wanted to get rid of offset, to make joints simpler. For backwards compatibility reasons, "offset" was not removed but kept. Via "constant" it was, however, removed from the parameter menu. Note, a constant "phi_offset" is also present in the Revolute joint (for the same reasons). |
|
Another option is to let |
…compatibility breaking changes
Is there any reason that s_offset is a constant rather than a parameter? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: