New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shall we use a three-digit version string #433

Open
modelica-trac-importer opened this Issue Oct 17, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@modelica-trac-importer

modelica-trac-importer commented Oct 17, 2018

Reported by cbertsch on 31 May 2018 18:23 UTC
For FMI 1.0 and FMI 2.0 we use a two-digit version string.
For FMI 3.0 it would be possible to use three-digit version string "FMI 3.0.0" and require, that an FMI 3.0.x importing compliant importing tool must be able to import all 3.0.y versions.


Migrated-From: https://trac.fmi-standard.org/ticket/433

@modelica-trac-importer

This comment has been minimized.

modelica-trac-importer commented Oct 17, 2018

Comment by andreas.junghanns on 31 May 2018 18:32 UTC
I would call it FMI 3.0 compliant, not FMI 3.0.y compliant (see your compatibility explanation). The version string in the FMU should likely be FMI 3.0.0 or later FMI 3.0.x but importers would largely ignore the bug-fix digit, except to be more strict in "later" versions because additional clarifications leave less room for interpretation and potential trial and error when running an FMU from earlier (more ambiguous) versions.
Right?

@modelica-trac-importer

This comment has been minimized.

modelica-trac-importer commented Oct 17, 2018

Modified by andreas.junghanns on 31 May 2018 18:32 UTC

@modelica-trac-importer modelica-trac-importer changed the title from Sahll we use a three-digit version string to Shall we use a three-digit version string Oct 17, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment