-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
[bugfix] fix agent_template #6723
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bugfix] fix agent_template #6723
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a bug within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes a bug in _add_dynamic_eos where unlabeled sequences at the end of the labels list were not handled. The change correctly extends the loop range and adds necessary boundary checks to prevent index errors. The fix is correct. I've added one suggestion to improve the readability and maintainability of the logic within the loop.
swift/llm/template/base.py
Outdated
| if labels[i - 1] >= 0 and i < len(labels) and labels[i] == -100: | ||
| start = i | ||
| if start > 0 and labels[i - 1] == -100 and labels[i] >= 0: | ||
| if start > 0 and labels[i - 1] == -100 and (i == len(labels) or labels[i] >= 0): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this if condition (labels[i - 1] == -100) is mutually exclusive with the condition in the if statement on line 984 (labels[i - 1] >= 0), using elif here would make the logic clearer and improve maintainability by explicitly showing the relationship between the two checks. This also yields a minor performance improvement as the second condition won't be checked if the first one is true.
| if start > 0 and labels[i - 1] == -100 and (i == len(labels) or labels[i] >= 0): | |
| elif start > 0 and labels[i - 1] == -100 and (i == len(labels) or labels[i] >= 0): |
No description provided.