Permalink
Browse files

checkout: do not lose staged removal

The logic to checkout a different commit implements the safety to never
lose user's local changes.  For example, switching from a commit to
another commit, when you have changed a path that is different between
them, need to merge your changes to the version from the switched-to
commit, which you may not necessarily be able to resolve easily.  By
default, "git checkout" refused to switch branches, to give you a chance
to stash your local changes (or use "-m" to merge, accepting the risks of
getting conflicts).

This safety, however, had one deliberate hole since early June 2005.  When
your local change was to remove a path (and optionally to stage that
removal), the command checked out the path from the switched-to commit
nevertheless.

This was to allow an initial checkout to happen smoothly (e.g. an initial
checkout is done by starting with an empty index and switching from the
commit at the HEAD to the same commit).  We can tighten the rule slightly
to allow this special case to pass, without losing sight of removal
explicitly done by the user, by noticing if the index is truly empty when
the operation begins.

For historical background, see:

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/4641/focus=4646

This case is marked as *0* in the message, which both Linus and I said "it
feels somewhat wrong but otherwise we cannot start from an empty index".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
  • Loading branch information...
gitster committed Sep 8, 2008
1 parent aaefbfa commit 5521883490e85f4d973141972cf16f89a79f1979
Showing with 24 additions and 2 deletions.
  1. +10 −1 Documentation/git-read-tree.txt
  2. +2 −0 builtin-checkout.c
  3. +1 −0 builtin-read-tree.c
  4. +10 −1 unpack-trees.c
  5. +1 −0 unpack-trees.h
@@ -160,7 +160,10 @@ Here are the "carry forward" rules:
0 nothing nothing nothing (does not happen)
1 nothing nothing exists use M
2 nothing exists nothing remove path from index
- 3 nothing exists exists use M
+ 3 nothing exists exists, use M if "initial checkout"
+ H == M keep index otherwise
+ exists fail
+ H != M
clean I==H I==M
------------------
@@ -207,6 +210,12 @@ you picked it up via e-mail in a patch form), `git diff-index
merge, but it would not show in `git diff-index --cached $M`
output after two-tree merge.
+Case #3 is slightly tricky and needs explanation. The result from this
+rule logically should be to remove the path if the user staged the removal
+of the path and then swiching to a new branch. That however will prevent
+the initial checkout from happening, so the rule is modified to use M (new
+tree) only when the contents of the index is empty. Otherwise the removal
+of the path is kept as long as $H and $M are the same.
3-Way Merge
~~~~~~~~~~~
View
@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ static int merge_working_tree(struct checkout_opts *opts,
}
/* 2-way merge to the new branch */
+ topts.initial_checkout = (!active_nr &&
+ (old->commit == new->commit));
topts.update = 1;
topts.merge = 1;
topts.gently = opts->merge;
View
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ int cmd_read_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *unused_prefix)
break;
case 2:
opts.fn = twoway_merge;
+ opts.initial_checkout = !active_nr;
break;
case 3:
default:
View
@@ -941,8 +941,17 @@ int twoway_merge(struct cache_entry **src, struct unpack_trees_options *o)
return -1;
}
}
- else if (newtree)
+ else if (newtree) {
+ if (oldtree && !o->initial_checkout) {
+ /*
+ * deletion of the path was staged;
+ */
+ if (same(oldtree, newtree))
+ return 1;
+ return reject_merge(oldtree, o);
+ }
return merged_entry(newtree, current, o);
+ }
return deleted_entry(oldtree, current, o);
}
View
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct unpack_trees_options {
verbose_update:1,
aggressive:1,
skip_unmerged:1,
+ initial_checkout:1,
gently:1;
const char *prefix;
int pos;

0 comments on commit 5521883

Please sign in to comment.