Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mondo release request #936

Closed
matentzn opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Mondo release request #936

matentzn opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@matentzn
Copy link
Member

@matentzn matentzn commented Nov 11, 2019

In order to map Mondo to other disease ontologies, I basically need mondo-base.owl and the equivalent-class mappings of MONDO ids to other disease ontology IDS (DOID, ORPHANET, etc).

Is it possible to include the MONDO alignments (bridges) as part of the release in a sperate file?

@maglott

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@maglott maglott commented Nov 11, 2019

I concur that this would be of general use. Does the definition of 'equivalent-class' mapping require that the MONDO/Other relationship is strictly 1:1?

@cmungall

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@cmungall cmungall commented Nov 11, 2019

@matentzn the equivalencies are always available at http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/mondo/imports/equivalencies.owl

base:
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/mondo/mondo-base.owl

@maglott - the semantics of owl equivalentClass are such that all concepts are strictly identical in meaning. This always translates to a 1:1 mapping, except when we do a 'proxy merge' - we decide that two concepts in an external resource mean the same thing. This is rare, and the numbers usually come down as we work with the upstream to resolve this.

I will leave this open until we have better documentation and all our products are fully described on the obo page

@maglott

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@maglott maglott commented Nov 11, 2019

Thanks

@matentzn

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

@matentzn matentzn commented Nov 11, 2019

Ok thanks! I will close this then for now!

@matentzn matentzn closed this Nov 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.