Meadowphysics Docs update #8
Conversation
|
i'm in sweden until next week. i can likely get this done by next friday
…On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris McAvoy ***@***.***> wrote:
@cmcavoy <https://github.com/cmcavoy> requested your review on:
monome/docs#8 <#8> [WIP do not merge]
Meadowphysics Docs update.
—
You are receiving this because your review was requested.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8 (comment)>, or mute the
thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPEcPJmOQPJ_5ikLPKmOaX1cqV9ZJi6ks5s0yeygaJpZM4QTdMQ>
.
|
|
No rush!
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:51 AM brian crabtree <notifications@github.com>
wrote:
… i'm in sweden until next week. i can likely get this done by next friday
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris McAvoy ***@***.***>
wrote:
> @cmcavoy <https://github.com/cmcavoy> requested your review on:
> monome/docs#8 <#8> [WIP do not merge]
> Meadowphysics Docs update.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because your review was requested.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#8 (comment)>, or mute the
> thread
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPEcPJmOQPJ_5ikLPKmOaX1cqV9ZJi6ks5s0yeygaJpZM4QTdMQ
>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD8x0_Kp22Y_76My4YSOeSsPZ7KM2D1ks5s0zulgaJpZM4QTdMQ>
.
|
|
Quick update, I have the illustrator files necessary to finish this. Will work with my graphic designer wife to finish this up. No ETA, but would like to be done sooner than later. |
|
checking in on this! how's it going? |
|
Hello! I'm going to add the illustrator templates to this PR, that's the blocker for me. I think the text is all ready to go (could use another set of eyes to confirm), just need the graphics. I haven't been able to get time from mrs. @cmcavoy to do the updates. From my POV, if the text is ok - just release that and then see if we can get a designer volunteer on lines to finish up the graphics? |
…ibuted by Piotr Szyhalski (@laborcamp) and are added here with his permission.
…c needs here. Also made a few grammar changes. I still don't trust my ability to use effect and affect properly, so merger beware.
|
@tehn looks like the images from the ansible docs are ok to use here. None of the ones I pulled over include the ability to choose notes / cv out, so this is good to go. I cleaned up a bit of the language on a re-read. I think this is ready to merge. |
|
spectacular, thank you. i'm going to copy v1 to a backup file to link it as some people may have/prefer the old version. will get this merged after i do that. |
|
The 1.x code isn't tagged in the MP repo. If that's possible, can't hurt. Definitely a different approach than 2.1. |
|
i’ll find the final commit of 1.x |
|
i've located the v1 firmware commit, noted it in the newly-saved mp1.md. can you fix this merge? also we don't need the .zip file included. |
|
Made a change to resolve the merge issue that may break links. I moved the 1.x MP docs into a subfolder called MP1 and 2.x into MP2. I changed the permalink tag at the top of each index, but I'm not sure what links to these pages, so it might be an issue. @tehn your last commit deleted the meadowphysics/index.md...not sure if that was your intention. Do you want to have two folders (the way I have it now?) or were you just trying to save the docs generally? Either way works...if you don't like this split into two folders, I can move the MP2 docs back into |
|
i'd keep v2 in /meadowphysics/ and v1 be its own subfolder, thanks. |
|
updated comment, sorry. v1 should be a subfolder. current version (v2) stays in root. |
|
Got it...i'll make that change in a bit. |
|
Ok, updates made. |
|
amazing!! thank you! |
Updates to the MP module docs based on 2.1 changes. This branch isn't ready to be merged, it doesn't have images and most likely needs some editing / word-smithing. Several parts are cut and pasted from lines threads, so might need some voice consolidation / blending.
I thought a PR would help reviewers.