Tidy up of help files, new version of Managing.html, minor changes for

version 2004081100.

lang/en/help/workshop/agreeassessments.html

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 	assessments made by other students there is no feedback 
 	from the students who submitted the work to the students who made
 	the assessment. There may be feedback from the teacher if the teacher
-	choses to grade the student assessments and then the teacher's grades and 
+	chooses to grade the student assessments and then the teacher's grades and 
 	comments will be available to both the student whose work it is and 
 	to the student who made the assessment. There will be, however, 
 	be only one way feedback between peers on any one piece of work.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 	opportunity to revise it. The revise/disagree loop can continue until
 	either agreement is reached or the deadline is reached. An assessment
 	which is still in "dispute" when the deadline is reached
-	is not used in the final calculations. This gives two way feedback
+	is not used in the final grades. This gives two way feedback
 	between peers on each piece of work.
 </OL>
 <P>If the second method of working is chosen there is the option of switching off the display

lang/en/help/workshop/assessmentofexamples.html

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
 <P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Assessment of Teacher's Examples</B></P>
 
-<P>After the teacher has submitted the examples it is useful from the 
-	teacher's point of view to assess these examples, if only partially. 
-	These assessments are private to the teacher, they are NOT shown 
-	to the students at any stage during the assignment. They are, 
-	however, useful when the teacher looks at the student assessments
-	of the examples. When grading a student assessment, the teacher 
-	sees their own assessment at the top of the page and the 
-	student's assessment of the same piece of work at the bottom of 
-	the page. The &quot;extra&quot; assessment acts as a reference 
-	source and a reminder of the salient points held in the example.
-</P>
+<P>After the teacher has submitted the examples it is important that the 
+	teacher assess these examples.</p>
+
+<p>These assessments are private to the teacher, they are NOT shown 
+	to the students at any stage during the assignment. However, they are, 
+	used internally as reference assessments against which the student assessments
+	are compared. The closer a student's assessment matches the teacher assessment 
+    the higher is their &quot;Grading grade&quot;. The teacher has a degree of 
+    control on how the agreement is translated into grades. This the 
+    &quot;Comparison of Assessments&quot; option in the workshop. This option 
+    can be changed at any time and the comparisons re-calculated.</P>
+

lang/en/help/workshop/gradingstrategy.html

@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@
 	must then choose one of the five statements for each of their assessments. As with
 	the Banded assignment the assessor can adjust the suggested grade by up to 
 	20% to give the final grade.
+
+<li><b>Rubric</b> This is a similar to Criterion Grading except there are multiple
+	sets of criteria. Each set covering a particular &quot;Category&quot;, can have 
+	up to five statements. The sets are given individual 
+	weights and the grade is a weighted combination of the scores from each set. There 
+	is <b>no</b> adjustment option in this assessment type. 
 </OL>
 
 </P>

lang/en/help/workshop/gradingsubmissions.html

@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
 <P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Grading of Student Submissions</B></P>
 
-<P>In general the teacher will want to assess the work submitted by the
-	students. The assessments are shown to the students and should provide
-	feedback on their work.</P>
-<P>The grades from these assessments can be used
-	in two ways in the final grade calculation. Firstly, the grade itself can be 
-	used as a (weighted) component in the final grade. Secondly, these 
-	grades can optionally be added into the pool of peer assessments and 
-	used as a &quot;calming factor&quot; if it felt that the student 
-	assessments are too high or too low.
+<P>In general, it is recommended that the teacher assesses a fair proportion of
+    the work submitted by the students. The assessments are shown to the 
+    students and will provide important feedback on their work.</P>
+
+<P>The assessments from the teacher are used in two ways in the workshop 
+    module. Firstly, they are used in the calculations to determine 
+    the &quot;grading grades&quot;, the grades given the student assessments.
+    Secondly they are used in the calculation of the submission grades. These
+    assessments can be given extra weight (the &quot;Weight of Teacher 
+    Assessments&quot; option), this weighting effects both the grading grade
+    and the submission grade calculations. If it felt that the student 
+    assessments are too high (or too low), increasing this weighting factor 
+    should be considered as that will help stablise the grades to a degree.
 </P>

lang/en/help/workshop/leaguetable.html

@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 <P ALIGN=CENTER><B>The League Table of Submissions</B></P>
 
 <p>The League Table lists the best submissions produced in the assignment. The number 
-	of entries can set to Zero, a number between 1 and 20, 50 or &quot;All&quot;. If set to 
-	Zero then the League Table is <b>not</b> displayed. If it is set to a number between 
-	1 and 20 or 50 then that number of submissions are shown, for example, setting 
-	the number to 10 shows the top ten submissions. Setting the number to 
-	&quot;All&quot; gives a table that lists all the submissions.</p>
+	of entries can set to zero, a number between 1 and 20, 50 or 100. If set to 
+	zero then the League Table is <b>not</b> displayed. If it is set to a number between 
+	1 and 20, 50 or 100 then that number of submissions are shown, for example, setting 
+	the number to 10 shows the top ten submissions. </p>
 
-<p>The second option contols whether the names of the students are included 
-	in the Table or not. This option controls the students' view of the Table, the teacher 
-	always sees the names of the students.</p>
-