Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 4, 2023. It is now read-only.

Try mutt #32

Closed
moonglum opened this issue Feb 4, 2014 · 13 comments
Closed

Try mutt #32

moonglum opened this issue Feb 4, 2014 · 13 comments

Comments

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner

moonglum commented Feb 4, 2014

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Feb 4, 2014

This will result in one impressive neckbeard.

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Feb 4, 2014

:neckbeard:

@bitboxer
Copy link

bitboxer commented Feb 4, 2014

I tried mutt, but I need my HTML in my mails 😭

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Feb 4, 2014

Hm... Apart from Newsletters I don't need that I think 😉

@bitboxer
Copy link

bitboxer commented Feb 4, 2014

Thought that, too. But it turns out that's not the case for me..that was really frightening for me that I rely on that so much.

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Feb 4, 2014

Hu! When I tried it I will report back :neckbeard:

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Jul 7, 2014

Notes about offlineimap:

echo -n | openssl s_client -CApath /etc/ssl/certs -connect aldebaran.uberspace.de:imaps -showcerts | sed -ne '/-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-/,/-END CERTIFICATE-/p' > .certs/aldebaran-uberspace.pem

In the offlineimaprc:

sslcacertfile = ~/.certs/aldebaran-uberspace.pem

(thanks @bascht)

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Jul 7, 2014

ln -sfv /usr/local/opt/offline-imap/*.plist ~/Library/LaunchAgents/

@bascht
Copy link
Contributor

bascht commented Jul 7, 2014

@bitboxer You can tell mutt to pipe html only mails through any command:
screenshot from 2014-07-07 23 16 50

(works pretty well with antiword for word docs / pdfs :neckbeard:)

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Jul 7, 2014

👯

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 13, 2014

I wasn't absolutely certain on this so I did a test. It doesn't actually turn it into a file if it is a directory. It links the source files in new respective links within the target directory. But it might be safer to have that slash in the end. I deleted my comment to avoid any further confusion, sorry.

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

No problem – I checked again and it works with or without the slash. But I agree: The slash makes it less confusing.

@moonglum
Copy link
Owner Author

moonglum commented Jul 4, 2023

@moonglum moonglum closed this as completed Jul 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants