New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes for big-endian platforms #60
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #60 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.02% 98.02%
=======================================
Files 79 79
Lines 5105 5105
=======================================
Hits 5004 5004
Misses 101 101
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
I'm testing it right now (UtilityDirectoryTest has been running for the last 10 minutes, is that normal)? One test that failed so far is:
You won't able to test for POWER9 (this is like testing specifically for Skylake or Ryzen, you need to ping kernel directly for that), but you can test for POWER:
|
OK, it finished. The only failing tests are:
The 1st is mentioned above, the 2nd you can fix by checking e.g. for |
So they skip the test instead of polluting the filesystem with random files and then complaining that it didn't fail.
Thanks a lot! 馃憤 The
Yeah sorry there's a little benchmark comparing various file copy approaches. It runs in a second on a SSD and in around five seconds on a HDD. Didn't expect it to run on such a device, so that's why 馃槄 I force-pushed an updated version, if you could do one last check with just the two formerly failing tests, like this, would be great. Thanks for all your help! 馃憤 ctest --output-on-failure -R (SystemTest|StridedArrayViewTest) |
All tests have passed. |
Likewise, thanks for the confirmation! :) |
Should cover everything reported in #58 (and https://pastebin.com/GkSgVGyd), except the System test, as I have no idea what preprocessor macros to use to detect a Power9 architecture. I'm also a bit unsure about the SHA-1 fix, but hopefully it's the correct place to make that change.
@pkubaj would be wonderful if you could run the tests again on this branch 馃檹 thanks in advance!