Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Num Maximun of ambiguous #337
Comments
|
We suggest zero. This is a problem with the 2x300 cycle kit as we argue here: http://blog.mothur.org/2014/09/11/Why-such-a-large-distance-matrix/ We are still advocating that people sequence the V4 region with the 2x250 nt V2 chemistry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
selucote commentedMay 22, 2017
Hi! I've one doubt about the number of ambiguous bases in the reads.
How many ambiguous bases in our reads we could accept? I mean, I've more than 274,000 illumina PE300 reads, but when I trimmmed using maxambig = 0, my sequences were reduced to 56,000. This is not a quality problem of reads since the FASTC quality analyses offer a good overall quality.
I've read that it could keep up to 5 ambigs. What's your opinion about that?
Thanks!