Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Num Maximun of ambiguous #337

Open
selucote opened this Issue May 22, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants

Hi! I've one doubt about the number of ambiguous bases in the reads.
How many ambiguous bases in our reads we could accept? I mean, I've more than 274,000 illumina PE300 reads, but when I trimmmed using maxambig = 0, my sequences were reduced to 56,000. This is not a quality problem of reads since the FASTC quality analyses offer a good overall quality.
I've read that it could keep up to 5 ambigs. What's your opinion about that?

Thanks!

Contributor

pschloss commented May 22, 2017

We suggest zero. This is a problem with the 2x300 cycle kit as we argue here:

http://blog.mothur.org/2014/09/11/Why-such-a-large-distance-matrix/

We are still advocating that people sequence the V4 region with the 2x250 nt V2 chemistry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment